Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failure fix for M1mac and noLD - long double problems for sum(weights) #981

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 23, 2023

Conversation

Melkiades
Copy link
Contributor

@Melkiades Melkiades commented Jun 21, 2023

@Melkiades Melkiades changed the title This is a matter of precision Failure fix for M1mac and noLD - long double problems for sum(weights) Jun 21, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 21, 2023

badge

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                                   Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
---------------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/abnormal_by_baseline.R                      62       0  100.00%
R/abnormal_by_marked.R                        52       5  90.38%   115-119
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade_worsen.R           113       3  97.35%   233-235
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade.R                   37       0  100.00%
R/abnormal.R                                  40       0  100.00%
R/analyze_vars_in_cols.R                     113      23  79.65%   164, 188-193, 206, 219-225, 268-274, 305
R/combination_function.R                       9       0  100.00%
R/compare_variables.R                        139       5  96.40%   126-127, 137, 241, 259
R/control_incidence_rate.R                    20       8  60.00%   32-35, 38-41
R/control_logistic.R                           7       0  100.00%
R/control_step.R                              23       1  95.65%   58
R/control_survival.R                          15       0  100.00%
R/count_cumulative.R                          47       1  97.87%   63
R/count_missed_doses.R                        31       0  100.00%
R/count_occurrences_by_grade.R                84       6  92.86%   156-158, 161, 176-177
R/count_occurrences.R                         61       1  98.36%   92
R/count_patients_events_in_cols.R             67       1  98.51%   62
R/count_patients_with_event.R                 33       0  100.00%
R/count_patients_with_flags.R                 39       0  100.00%
R/count_values.R                              24       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression_inter.R                     154       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression.R                           161       0  100.00%
R/coxph.R                                    169       9  94.67%   19-20, 213-217, 261, 276, 284, 290-291
R/d_pkparam.R                                406       0  100.00%
R/decorate_grob.R                            169      40  76.33%   232-263, 323-325, 332, 353-390
R/desctools_binom_diff.R                     663      66  90.05%   55, 90-91, 131-132, 135, 214, 240-249, 288, 290, 310, 314, 318, 322, 378, 381, 384, 387, 448, 456, 468-469, 475-478, 486, 489, 498, 501, 549-550, 552-553, 555-556, 558-559, 629, 641-654, 659, 706, 719, 723
R/df_explicit_na.R                            30       0  100.00%
R/estimate_multinomial_rsp.R                  47       1  97.87%   60
R/estimate_proportion.R                      199      12  93.97%   75-82, 86, 91, 294, 461, 566
R/fit_rsp_step.R                              36       0  100.00%
R/fit_survival_step.R                         36       0  100.00%
R/formatting_functions.R                     115       3  97.39%   107, 145, 155
R/g_forest.R                                 437      23  94.74%   197, 248-249, 316, 333-334, 339-340, 353, 369, 416, 447, 523, 532, 613-617, 627, 702, 705, 829
R/g_lineplot.R                               199      29  85.43%   160, 173, 201, 227-230, 307-314, 332-333, 339-349, 441, 449
R/g_step.R                                    68       1  98.53%   109
R/g_waterfall.R                               47       0  100.00%
R/h_adsl_adlb_merge_using_worst_flag.R        74       0  100.00%
R/h_biomarkers_subgroups.R                    40       0  100.00%
R/h_cox_regression.R                         110       0  100.00%
R/h_logistic_regression.R                    468       3  99.36%   206-207, 276
R/h_map_for_count_abnormal.R                  54       0  100.00%
R/h_pkparam_sort.R                            15       0  100.00%
R/h_response_biomarkers_subgroups.R           75       0  100.00%
R/h_response_subgroups.R                     171      12  92.98%   257-270
R/h_stack_by_baskets.R                        65       1  98.46%   91
R/h_step.R                                   180       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R           79       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_duration_subgroups.R            200      12  94.00%   259-271
R/incidence_rate.R                            93       7  92.47%   55-62
R/individual_patient_plot.R                  133       0  100.00%
R/kaplan_meier_plot.R                        630      61  90.32%   260-295, 304-308, 508, 680-682, 690-692, 717, 724-725, 897, 1086, 1403-1414
R/logistic_regression.R                      101       0  100.00%
R/missing_data.R                              21       3  85.71%   32, 66, 76
R/odds_ratio.R                               106       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff_test.R                            88       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff.R                                260      16  93.85%   72-75, 107, 267-274, 413, 473, 578
R/prune_occurrences.R                         57      10  82.46%   138-142, 188-192
R/response_biomarkers_subgroups.R             60       0  100.00%
R/response_subgroups.R                       165       4  97.58%   273, 315-317
R/rtables_access.R                            38       4  89.47%   159-162
R/score_occurrences.R                         20       1  95.00%   124
R/split_cols_by_groups.R                      49       0  100.00%
R/stat.R                                      47       3  93.62%   73-74, 129
R/summarize_ancova.R                          95       1  98.95%   180
R/summarize_change.R                          27       0  100.00%
R/summarize_colvars.R                          6       0  100.00%
R/summarize_coxreg.R                         156       2  98.72%   198, 410
R/summarize_glm_count.R                      164       4  97.56%   159, 164, 208, 261
R/summarize_num_patients.R                    74       9  87.84%   103-105, 150-151, 217-222
R/summarize_patients_exposure_in_cols.R       97       1  98.97%   56
R/summarize_variables.R                      220       2  99.09%   266, 492
R/survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R             60       0  100.00%
R/survival_coxph_pairwise.R                   73       9  87.67%   59-67
R/survival_duration_subgroups.R              172       0  100.00%
R/survival_time.R                             47       0  100.00%
R/survival_timepoint.R                       116       7  93.97%   126-132
R/utils_checkmate.R                           68       0  100.00%
R/utils_factor.R                              87       1  98.85%   84
R/utils_grid.R                               111       5  95.50%   149, 258-264
R/utils_rtables.R                             86       7  91.86%   24, 31-35, 346-347
R/utils.R                                    137      10  92.70%   92, 94, 98, 118, 121, 124, 128, 137-138, 311
TOTAL                                       9147     433  95.27%

Diff against main

Filename                   Stmts    Miss  Cover
-----------------------  -------  ------  -------
R/estimate_proportion.R       +1      +1  -0.47%
TOTAL                         +1      +1  -0.01%

Results for commit: 9c2b477

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 21, 2023

Unit Tests Summary

       1 files    78 suites   1m 21s ⏱️
   738 tests 738 ✔️     0 💤 0
1 567 runs  984 ✔️ 583 💤 0

Results for commit a0ff813.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

@shajoezhu shajoezhu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! Thanks @Melkiades for the changes. Tested by @duanx9 on m1mac machine, it is working, and previous bug was reproducible. Approve the PR to unblock the merge. Once the conflict is addressed we are good to go! Thanks @Melkiades

@shajoezhu shajoezhu self-assigned this Jun 23, 2023
@shajoezhu shajoezhu added the sme label Jun 23, 2023
@Melkiades Melkiades merged commit 8396e63 into main Jun 23, 2023
@Melkiades Melkiades deleted the 976_fix_estimate_prop@main branch June 23, 2023 14:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

estimate_proportion error
2 participants