Add extra

[pawelru]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                          Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  -------------------------------------------
R/check.R                            73      73  0.00%    27-224
R/deps_installation_proposal.R      143     143  0.00%    62-280
R/desc_utils.R                       96      43  55.21%   15-32, 108, 117-122, 172, 195, 208-247, 265
R/get_ref.R                         239     238  0.42%    13-473, 492-535
R/solve.R                            84      84  0.00%    9-170
R/utils.R                            66      42  36.36%   3-23, 41, 47, 57-104
TOTAL                               701     623  11.13%

Diff against main

Filename                          Stmts    Miss  Cover
------------------------------  -------  ------  --------
R/deps_installation_proposal.R       +4      +4  +100.00%
R/desc_utils.R                      +25       0  +15.77%
TOTAL                               +29      +4  +3.24%

Results for commit: 994e0de

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

 1 files   4 suites   1s ⏱️
43 tests 15 ✅ 28 💤 0 ❌
96 runs  67 ✅ 29 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 994e0de.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[averissimo]

This is similar to what I had in mind 💯

I think we should create a safeguard to prevent manipulation of direct dependencies.

We can't protect against all malicious use, but this is an easy one in my opinion.

[github-actions]

Unit Test Performance Difference

Additional test case details

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	Test Case
desc_utils	👶		$+0.02$	desc_add_extra_deps_raises_error_for_already_existing_package
desc_utils	👶		$+0.01$	desc_add_extra_deps_will_add_extra_dependencies

Results for commit 54b385d

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[averissimo]

LGTM! 💯