Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Snap installations broken without "confinement: classic" #2031

Open
lidel opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Snap installations broken without "confinement: classic" #2031

lidel opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
area/linux Linux help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) kind/maintenance Work required to avoid breaking changes or harm to project's status quo P3 Low: Not priority right now status/blocked Unable to be worked further until needs are met

Comments

@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Mar 14, 2022 •
edited
Loading

TLDR: snap confinement should not be applied to tools like ipfs-desktop. This is called "classic" mode.

I filled a request to apply "classic" confinement to ipfs-desktop in https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/ipfs-desktop-classic-review/28517

👉 Until this is fixed, please avoid using Snap, and choose .AppImage instead.
👉 If you really, really want to use Snap, please raise support here.
@lidel lidel added kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization area/linux Linux kind/maintenance Work required to avoid breaking changes or harm to project's status quo status/in-progress In progress and removed need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization labels Mar 14, 2022
@lidel lidel changed the title Snap Classic Snap installations broken without "confinement: classic" Mar 14, 2022
@lidel lidel mentioned this issue Mar 14, 2022
Closed
@lidel lidel pinned this issue Mar 14, 2022
lidel added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2022
@lidel
docs: discourage snap
0c1f1ce 
Context: #2031
@lidel lidel mentioned this issue Mar 22, 2022
Closed
@lidel
Copy link
Member Author

lidel commented Jun 23, 2022 •
edited
Loading

If anyone familiar with Snap has time to debug this, please comment in this thread.

Taking a step back:

We have 1k of users at https://snapcraft.io/ipfs-desktop and maintenance burden is not worth it.
If we don't get classic confinement, I suggest we follow the plan from ipfs/kubo#8688

@hacdias hacdias mentioned this issue Sep 2, 2022
Closed
@SgtPooki SgtPooki added status/blocked Unable to be worked further until needs are met and removed status/in-progress In progress labels Feb 10, 2023
@SgtPooki SgtPooki added help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue P3 Low: Not priority right now labels Oct 31, 2023
@lidel lidel unpinned this issue Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/linux Linux help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) kind/maintenance Work required to avoid breaking changes or harm to project's status quo P3 Low: Not priority right now status/blocked Unable to be worked further until needs are met
Projects
No open projects
IPFS-GUI (PL EngRes)
Status: Needs Prep Work / Blocked
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lidel @SgtPooki