Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename repository to "utilities" instead of "templates"? #9

Closed
naga-karthik opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Rename repository to "utilities" instead of "templates"? #9

naga-karthik opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@naga-karthik
Copy link
Member

naga-karthik commented Mar 17, 2023

As mentioned in the title, this repository is evolving towards a collection of utility files for dataset conversion or training scripts or models, etc. Hence, I was thinking of renaming it to "utilities". What are your thoughts, @jcohenadad ?

@naga-karthik naga-karthik changed the title Rename repository to "utilities" instead of Rename repository to "utilities" instead of "templates"? Mar 17, 2023
@jcohenadad
Copy link
Member

my 2-cent would be to rename as data-conversion

@naga-karthik
Copy link
Member Author

Renaming complete!

@valosekj
Copy link
Member

valosekj commented Jun 22, 2023

Recently, @naga-karthik proposed a script for running the nnUNet inference (see this PR). The script is currently located under the ivadomed/model_seg_sci repository. But since the script is universal, it could be moved to this repo. But then, the repo should probably be renamed back to utilities (instead of the current data-conversion).
What do you think?

@naga-karthik
Copy link
Member Author

I totally agree! The purpose of this repository was to indeed share a skeleton-structure of the utility scripts that the students could use it as it is or adapt it for their projects.

@valosekj
Copy link
Member

Okay, thanks all for your feedback. Repo renamed back to utilities.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants