JSP TCK Refactoring using Arquillian and JUnit

[alwin-joseph]

Related Issue(s)
#1126

Describe the change

• Converted standalone legacy JSP Tests under jsp/src/main/java/com/sun/ts/tests/jsp/ to run as Junit tests, uses Arquillian
• Created glassfish runner
• No vehicle specified in https://github.com/jakartaee/platform-tck/blob/e3ab547f4308877e2178ef21609c0d8aac45f766/install/jakartaee/other/vehicle.properties, hence standalone and platform run implementations are same.
• All standalone JSP tests are refactored (except signature test)

Pending items :

• 18 security tests under jsp/src/main/java/com/sun/ts/tests/jsp/spec/security which is run only for full & web platform mode is yet to be refactored. These tests will be tagged "security" so it can be excluded for standalone mode.
• 10 tests under jsp/src/main/java/com/sun/ts/tests/jsp/spec/tagext/resource which is run only for full platform mode is yet to be refactored. These tests will be tagged "resource" so it can be excluded for standalone and web profile.
• 1 signature test is pending

[scottmarlow]

@markt-asf @stuartwdouglas like other TCK rewriting, the JSP TCK rewrite is going to be too big to review. IMO, when we have time to try running different implementations against rewritten TCKs, we will better be able to review the new TCKs. Having said that, your feedback is welcome on this pr.

[gurunrao]

code changes looks good to me, I have added minor comments for future maintainability.

[arjantijms]

Maybe these things can (should?) move to the base class of the IT tests?

@BeforeEach
   void logStartTest(TestInfo testInfo) {
     logger.log(Logger.Level.INFO, "STARTING TEST : "+testInfo.getDisplayName());
   }

   @AfterEach
   void logFinishTest(TestInfo testInfo) {
     logger.log(Logger.Level.INFO, "FINISHED TEST : "+testInfo.getDisplayName());
   }

[alwin-joseph]

@arjantijms @olamy I have added the changes to use host/port from Arquillian only in latest commit. If no other comments I will merge this PR by tomorrow.

@dmatej I re-requested review by mistake. Please ignore.