Avm incentives #20
Closed
Avm incentives #20
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…algokey generate`" (algorand#5974)
jannotti
force-pushed
the
avm-incentives
branch
from
c6ae176
to
bba4c37
Compare
Co-authored-by: ohill <[email protected]>
…#5757) Co-authored-by: Jason Paulos <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: cce <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: chris erway <[email protected]>
This looks back 320 rounds, so a fair amount of replumbing was required to give `eval` code access to `LookupAgreement`. evalindexer was removed, and many unit tests were updated to use TestConsensusRange and DoubleLedger instead of newTestLedger. One fewer Ledger implementation in the code base!
jannotti
force-pushed
the
avm-incentives
branch
from
bba4c37
to
4f7c3f6
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Opcodes that seem important for potential pooling contracts