Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adding .git-blame-ignore-revs #528

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2022
Merged

Adding .git-blame-ignore-revs #528

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2022

Conversation

jglick
Copy link
Member

@jglick jglick commented Mar 24, 2022 •
edited
Loading

@jglick jglick requested review from bitwiseman and timja March 24, 2022 11:36
@jglick jglick marked this pull request as ready for review March 24, 2022 11:37
@jglick jglick mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2022
Merged
jtnord
jtnord approved these changes Mar 24, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jtnord jtnord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️ did not know this even existed!

@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Mar 24, 2022

Just added today: https://github.blog/changelog/2022-03-24-ignore-commits-in-the-blame-view-beta/

@jglick jglick merged commit 4268ac7 into jenkinsci:master Mar 24, 2022
@jglick jglick deleted the git-blame-ignore-revs branch March 24, 2022 11:55
@jglick jglick mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jtnord jtnord jtnord approved these changes

@bitwiseman bitwiseman Awaiting requested review from bitwiseman

@timja timja Awaiting requested review from timja

@car-roll car-roll Awaiting requested review from car-roll

@rsandell rsandell Awaiting requested review from rsandell

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
internal
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@jglick @jtnord