Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[JEP-222] Add experimental WebSocket support + Jetty update in Winstone + Remoting 4.0 #4369

Merged
merged 78 commits into from
Jan 21, 2020

Conversation

jglick
Copy link
Member

@jglick jglick commented Nov 22, 2019

See JEP-222. Downstream of jenkinsci/winstone#79 + jenkinsci/remoting#357 + jenkinsci/jenkins-test-harness#183.

Proposed Changelog Entries

@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Nov 26, 2019

Looks like there are some test failures.

Copy link
Contributor

@jeffret-b jeffret-b left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So far I've just done a quick overview review. It looks good. It's well structured and easy to follow. I like how nicely it fits into the existing structure while providing valuable new capability.

I'll do a more thorough review at a later time.

core/src/main/java/jenkins/slaves/WebSocketAgents.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
core/src/main/java/jenkins/websocket/WebSocketEcho.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test-pom/pom.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev added the major-rfe For changelog: Major enhancement. Will be highlighted on the top label Jan 15, 2020
@jglick jglick requested a review from a team January 15, 2020 13:07
@oleg-nenashev
Copy link
Member

oleg-nenashev commented Jan 16, 2020

@jglick what is the rollout plan for this change? Do you want to have it as Beta in the next LTS or just as GA? It might be useful to put it into the JEP explicitly. Beta status would be nice in the changelog

Copy link
Contributor

@fcojfernandez fcojfernandez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't tested it, but the code looks good

@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Jan 16, 2020

Do you want to have it as Beta in the next LTS or just as GA?

I do not think there is any formal mechanism for any such marking. We can phrase it as being experimental in the weekly changelog of course.

@oleg-nenashev
Copy link
Member

I do not think there is any formal mechanism for any such marking. We can phrase it as being experimental in the weekly changelog of course.

Changelog would be enough. APIs are already marked as @Beta

@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Jan 16, 2020

APIs are already marked as @Beta

And could probably stay that way unless plugins start to want to implement their own endpoints.

Copy link
Member

@timja timja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Haven't tested but code looks good

@jglick jglick added the ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback label Jan 17, 2020
@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev requested a review from a team January 17, 2020 05:50
@oleg-nenashev
Copy link
Member

requesting reviews from the @jenkinsci/core team since it is a major change under the hood of Jenkins. Unfortunately I do not have bandwidth to review it till the next week (wed or so), but I do not mind if it gets merged.with the current approvals.

@jglick Could you please also add the "collateral improvements" from Remoting and Winstone to the changelog?

@oleg-nenashev
Copy link
Member

I plan to merge it tomorrow if no negative feedback

@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Jan 20, 2020

requesting reviews from the @jenkinsci/core team

Note that I already requested reviews from @jenkinsci/core-pr-reviewers.

@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev merged commit 5b50402 into jenkinsci:master Jan 21, 2020
@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev changed the title [JEP-222] WebSocket support [JEP-222] Add experimental WebSocket support Jan 21, 2020
@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev changed the title [JEP-222] Add experimental WebSocket support [JEP-222] Add experimental WebSocket support + Jetty update in Winstone + Remoting 4.0 Jan 21, 2020
@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev added the rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted label Jan 21, 2020
@oleg-nenashev
Copy link
Member

@jglick would you be interested to write a blog post about this new feature?

@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Jan 21, 2020

Yes I should be able to do that.

@jglick jglick deleted the websocket branch January 21, 2020 18:21
@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Jan 21, 2020

Merged toward 2.216 FTR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
major-rfe For changelog: Major enhancement. Will be highlighted on the top ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants