Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose SHA-1s via HasteFS #5874

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2018
Merged

Expose SHA-1s via HasteFS #5874

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2018

Conversation

mjesun
Copy link
Contributor

@mjesun mjesun commented Mar 26, 2018

In order to access the SHA-1, if requested, we need to expose a public getter.

@mjesun
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjesun commented Mar 26, 2018

Euh... I have a test failure not related at all with my thing :(

@thymikee
Copy link
Collaborator

@mjesun it's a bug in Node 9.9, already patched and scheduled for some next release

@thymikee
Copy link
Collaborator

thymikee commented Mar 26, 2018

In tomorrow's patch release, to be exact: nodejs/node#19520

@mjesun
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjesun commented Mar 26, 2018

Thanks for the quick reply, @thymikee!

Copy link
Member

@cpojer cpojer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yap! I was waiting for this PR :D

@mjesun mjesun merged commit f31f253 into jestjs:master Mar 26, 2018
@mjesun mjesun deleted the haste-fs-get-sha-1 branch March 26, 2018 17:38
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 12, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants