-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Delete obsolete emails tag from header comment in test files #8377
chore: Delete obsolete emails tag from header comment in test files #8377
Conversation
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ | |||
* This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the | |||
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. | |||
* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The blank line under license can probably go too, yeah?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few .ts
files that I looked at for example have one:
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
*
*/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah it's totally inconsistent across the code base. I've learned to ignore it ^^
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lazy removal of @flow
pragmas is my guess
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that is a tactful way to say that I was consistently lazy, bro ❤️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
😀
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8377 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 62.29% 62.29%
=======================================
Files 266 266
Lines 10729 10729
Branches 2609 2609
=======================================
Hits 6684 6684
Misses 3460 3460
Partials 585 585 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Summary
Delete 14 occurrences of
* @emails oncall+jsinfra
line in header comment:e2e/babel-plugin-jest-hoist/__tests__/integration.test.js
e2e/babel-plugin-jest-hoist/__tests__/integrationAutomockOff.test.js
e2e/babel-plugin-jest-hoist/__tests__/typescript.test.ts
e2e/failures/__tests__/assertionCount.test.js
e2e/failures/__tests__/assertionError.test.js
e2e/failures/__tests__/asyncFailures.test.js
e2e/failures/__tests__/errorAfterTestComplete.test.js
e2e/failures/__tests__/snapshot.test.js
e2e/failures/__tests__/snapshotWithHint.test.js
e2e/failures/__tests__/testMacro.test.js
e2e/snapshot-mock-fs/__tests__/snapshot.test.js
e2e/snapshot/__tests__/secondSnapshot.test.js
e2e/snapshot/__tests__/snapshot.test.js
packages/jest-runtime/src/__tests__/Runtime-sourceMaps.test.js
Test plan
Now I remember why I didn’t delete them when I first noticed:
e2e/__tests__/__snapshots__/failures.test.ts.snap
toContain
expected strings ine2e/__tests__/failures.test.ts
CI will tell us how effective my local testing of Node versions was (made me feel like Simen lite :)