-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: bump dated deps #8693
chore: bump dated deps #8693
Conversation
Hmm, we've got one failure in |
@@ -870,197 +870,203 @@ const jestExpect = require('../'); | |||
|
|||
const basicReturnedWith = ['toHaveReturnedWith', 'toReturnWith']; | |||
if (basicReturnedWith.indexOf(returnedWith) >= 0) { | |||
test(`works with more calls than the limit`, () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ignore whitespace here (jest eslint complained about duplicate test names (now discovered due to jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest#239))
Downgrading
|
Will follow up with a PR for yargs (tomorrow). I think we just need to supply a type to all flags, might be wrong though. The failing test does |
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Summary
#8692 with reduced scope - just the
package.json
changes without a full refresh of the lockfile. If this passes I'll rebase that and dig some more.EDIT: ended up also bumping the eslint packages (within semver range) as they also necessitated some code changes
Test plan
Green CI