Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

log: Remove redundant log context. #2023

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2023

Conversation

bgrozev
Copy link
Member

@bgrozev bgrozev commented May 17, 2023

The Relay already has its ID in the context resulting in:
relayId=jvb-foo-bar relay-id=jvb-foo-bar

The Relay already has its ID in the context resulting in:
relayId=jvb-foo-bar relay-id=jvb-foo-bar
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 17, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2023 (52356da) into master (9eefa65) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2023      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     42.57%   42.52%   -0.06%     
+ Complexity     1679     1676       -3     
============================================
  Files           326      326              
  Lines         17007    17006       -1     
  Branches       2244     2244              
============================================
- Hits           7240     7231       -9     
- Misses         9055     9071      +16     
+ Partials        712      704       -8     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...g/jitsi/videobridge/relay/RelayMessageTransport.kt 7.46% <ø> (-0.46%) ⬇️

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9eefa65...52356da. Read the comment docs.

@bgrozev bgrozev merged commit 9563221 into jitsi:master May 18, 2023
@bgrozev bgrozev deleted the remove-redundant-context branch May 23, 2024 13:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants