Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose .connection on fragment block param #648

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2019

Conversation

machty
Copy link
Contributor

@machty machty commented Feb 19, 2019

This provides access to the connection object,
which in turn exposes properties like .peer_cert
for performing additional validation against
x509 certificates.

Closes #633, Follow-up to #634

@machty machty force-pushed the expose-connection branch 2 times, most recently from 71f5801 to 40204f2 Compare February 19, 2019 15:17
@machty machty changed the title Expose .connection on block param Expose .connection on fragment block param Feb 19, 2019
@machty
Copy link
Contributor Author

machty commented Feb 19, 2019

@TheSmartnik Ready for your review. Wondering if FragmentWithResponse needs a new name given that it now also has a connection object?

This provides access to the connection object,
which in turn exposes properties like `.peer_cert`
for performing additional validation against
x509 certificates.

Closes jnunemaker#633, Follow-up to jnunemaker#634
@machty
Copy link
Contributor Author

machty commented Mar 4, 2019

@TheSmartnik Hi, just checking in for an update.

@machty
Copy link
Contributor Author

machty commented Mar 18, 2019

@TheSmartnik Pinging for feedback :)

@TheSmartnik
Copy link
Collaborator

@machty thanks! Great job!

I'll rename the class myself before releasing a new version, so no worries

@TheSmartnik TheSmartnik merged commit 24106ee into jnunemaker:master Mar 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants