Rename secondary "tests" package in doc example

If multiple distributions have `tests` as a top-level package, they'll conflict whenever both are installed. (Examples [here]((https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/1905) and [here](NixOS/nixpkgs#81482). Two common alternative strategies are:

1. not distributing tests (as [here](https://github.com/pypa/sampleproject)), or 
2. placing tests in a subdirectory of the main package, rather than adjacent (as [here](http://blog.habnab.it/blog/2013/07/21/python-packages-and-you/) and [here](http://as.ynchrono.us/2007/12/filesystem-structure-of-python-project_21.html)). Each of these strategies will avoid this issue. 

Users may fall into this trap because of the [package documentation](https://python-poetry.org/docs/pyproject/#packages) page, which gives an example:

```
packages = [
    { include = "my_package" },
    { include = "tests", format = "sdist" },
]
```

Having two top-level packages in a distribution is relatively unusual, but does have some use cases.  Using `"tests"` as a top-level package name in the example is likely to lead to conflicts, however. The alternate package in the documentation example could have a unique name like `"my_other_package"`, which would reduce the likelihood of this kind of overlap.

docs/docs/pyproject.md

@@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ it by using `format`:
 # ...
 packages = [
     { include = "my_package" },
-    { include = "tests", format = "sdist" },
+    { include = "my_other_package", format = "sdist" },
 ]
 ```
 
-From now on, only the `sdist` build archive will include the `tests` package.
+From now on, only the `sdist` build archive will include the `my_other_package` package.
 
 !!!note