Docs(README): Fix mistakes in README

[HamadaSalhab]

Important

Fixes mistakes in README files by updating provider names, session chat structures, and document handling functions.

• Provider and API Key Updates:
  • Change provider from google to brave and update api_key references in README.md, README-CN.md, and README-JP.md.
• Session Chat Structure:
  • Update client.sessions.chat to use messages array instead of message string in README.md, README-CN.md, and README-JP.md.
• Document Handling:
  • Change client.documents.create to client.agents.docs.create and client.documents.search to client.agents.docs.search in README.md, README-CN.md, and README-JP.md.

^{This description was created by for 867ad75. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 867ad75 in 45 seconds

More details

• Looked at 171 lines of code in 3 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. README-CN.md:623

• Draft comment:
  The client.sessions.chat method now expects a list of messages instead of a single message string. Ensure that the messages parameter is used correctly as a list of dictionaries with role and content. This change is also applicable in README-JP.md and README.md.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful.

2. README-CN.md:635

• Draft comment:
  The method for creating documents has changed from client.documents.create to client.agents.docs.create. Similarly, searching documents has changed from client.documents.search to client.agents.docs.search. Ensure these changes are reflected in your code. This change is also applicable in README-JP.md and README.md.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful.

3. README-JP.md:617

• Draft comment:
  The user_id parameter in client.sessions.create should reference a user object, i.e., user_id=user.id instead of a hardcoded string like user_id="user123". This change is also applicable in README-CN.md and README.md.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment is about a change that has already been implemented in the diff, making it redundant. Additionally, it references changes in other files, which is not relevant to this review. Therefore, the comment should be removed.
  I might be overlooking the possibility that the comment is meant to reinforce the change or provide additional context. However, since the change is already made, the comment does not add value.
  The comment does not provide new information or context that is necessary after the change has been made. It is redundant and should be removed.
  The comment is about a change that has already been implemented, making it redundant. It should be removed.

Workflow ID: wflow_IdbSm45dREA7GKKr

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.