Added QUESTION and FEEDBACK comments across the codebase

[Bhabuk10]

Changes Made

• Added QUESTION and FEEDBACK comments across multiple files and directories.
• These comments provide insights and suggestions on the workflow and activity functions, improving code clarity and maintainability.

Issue Reference

This PR addresses issue #555 from the official Julep AI repository.

Notes for Reviewers

• I have added feedback and questions to help clarify the logic in several files.
• Please let me know if any adjustments or additional feedback are required.

---

Important

Added QUESTION and FEEDBACK comments across the codebase to improve code clarity and maintainability.

• Comments:
  • Added QUESTION and FEEDBACK comments in embed_docs.py, excecute_api_call.py, execute_integration.py, demo.py, embed_docs.py, mem_mgmt.py, test_activities.py, and test_agent_queries.py.
  • Comments address type checking, exception handling, testing patterns, and code clarity.
  • Suggestions for using mypy, handling timeouts, and improving test coverage.
  • Questions about rationale for certain code decisions, such as naming conventions and exception handling.
  • Feedback on improving documentation and code structure for better maintainability.

^{This description was created by for d0fde11. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to d0fde11 in 41 seconds

More details

• Looked at 327 lines of code in 8 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/excecute_api_call.py:70

• Draft comment:
  Catching BaseException is too broad and can obscure specific errors. Consider catching more specific exceptions like httpx.HTTPError for better error handling and debugging. This applies to other files as well, such as execute_integration.py.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment is relevant to the changes made in the diff, as it addresses the use of BaseException in the execute_api_call function. The suggestion to catch more specific exceptions is a valid code quality improvement. However, the part about applying this to other files is not relevant to the current diff and should be ignored.
  The comment might be too broad by mentioning other files, which is not relevant to the current review. It should focus only on the changes in the current file.
  The suggestion to catch more specific exceptions is valid and relevant to the changes in the current file. The part about other files can be ignored.
  Keep the comment but ignore the part about applying it to other files. The suggestion to catch more specific exceptions is valid for the current file.

2. agents-api/agents_api/activities/execute_integration.py:63

• Draft comment:
  Catching BaseException is too broad and can obscure specific errors. Consider catching more specific exceptions for better error handling and debugging. This applies to other files as well, such as excecute_api_call.py.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

Workflow ID: wflow_FKWtKNBMBAmOpNTN

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[Bhabuk10]

@creatorrr @ijindal1 I’ve submitted a pull request with QUESTION and FEEDBACK comments across the codebase and would appreciate your review and any guidance on further steps needed.