Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Jupyter Events and emit events from the Kernel Manager #832
Add Jupyter Events and emit events from the Kernel Manager #832
Changes from 6 commits
7da397f
8558fcb
b6350b0
62025bc
a4b51ff
a86d1b3
3e18df6
414b8ae
d66b50e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good @Zsailer - just have one question.
Is this in anticipation of supporting other actions, because all of the currently defined actions fire with a non-None
kernel_id
? If we retained that approach, we could then apply a format or pattern, allowing only UUID formats (and remove theoneOf
andnull
). This might allow event consumers to have an easier experience as well.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think
start_kernel
orpre_start_kernel
methods strictly require a kernel_id to start, right? This logic seems to suggest that ifNone
is provided, it creates a uuid on the fly.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is correct (on both counts; non-required kernel_id and auto-create logic). The provisioners should have access to the kernel-id from the get-go so they can do indexing, etc. as necessary.