-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sometime readline do not have set_completer_delims #63
Conversation
@tebeka can you give an example of when this is unavailable? |
@minrk Every time I run Anaconda |
can you import
|
IMO this is a version mismatch between the installed readline on arch vs the one anaconda expects.
However if you run the Anaconda Python:
There is
You'll see it depends on
|
That seems like a significant problem to bring up with Continuum, since it suggests that the readline isn't built correctly. |
ping @damianavila, @bollwyvl do you know who we should ping on the continuum team about that ? |
@ilanschnell is the man with the plan on this one. Certainly worth raising on https://github.com/ContinuumIO/anaconda-issues |
Thanks ! Might be related to ContinuumIO/anaconda-issues#455 |
I agree that Continuum should address the problem their end. But IMO they can't cover all the issue with readline. This small patch guards against such problems in the future. |
You can see that through the opposite view which is this patch hides an obvious bug in an underlying implementation or build of a specific package. It also confuses other dev into thinking If there is not fixes in conda that get released we can weight the cost of adding that in, which could make sens, but I prefer (for now) to wait on wether ContinuumIO/anaconda-issues#455 will be fixed. |
(N.B. We're also ditching readline for 5.0, so this won't be a longstanding problem) |
Thanks, merging, if we do a 4.2 release this should be backported, not sure there will be a 4.2 though. Sorry for the delay, |
News to me: what's the development that suggests otherwise? Love to help out if I can! |
The reason not to do 4.2 is that we might just go straight to 5.0. IIRC
there are only two minor things tagged for 4.2.
|
No description provided.