Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use RbNaCl for HMAC if available with fallback to OpenSSL #149

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2017
Merged

Use RbNaCl for HMAC if available with fallback to OpenSSL #149

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2017

Conversation

mwpastore
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mwpastore mwpastore force-pushed the rbnacl branch 3 times, most recently from 8a0675b to b9b865e Compare May 7, 2016 07:40
@excpt
Copy link
Member

excpt commented Aug 22, 2016

For the 1.x version I will not add any new features. This PR is interesting for version 2.0.

@excpt excpt added this to the Version 2.0.0 milestone Aug 22, 2016
@mwpastore
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @excpt, I've rebased this to master if you're interested in including it in the 2.0 release. Let me know if you'd like any changes!

@excpt excpt modified the milestones: Version 2.0.0, Version 3.0.0 Feb 22, 2017
@excpt excpt merged commit f8a576e into jwt:master Feb 22, 2017
@excpt
Copy link
Member

excpt commented Feb 22, 2017

Thanks for the Rebase 👍

@mwpastore
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yessir, thanks for the merge!

@mwpastore mwpastore deleted the rbnacl branch February 22, 2017 21:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@excpt excpt excpt approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement review required
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Version 2.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@mwpastore @excpt