Verify if verify is truthy (not just true) #17
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Previously, verification was carried out only if verify was true, rather than any non-false, non-nil value, as is conventional in Ruby. This made it perilously easy to skip verification by accident.
progrium
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2013
Verify if verify is truthy (not just true)
|
Can you also open an issue to release an update gem and add you to contributor list. |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, verification was carried out only if
verify == true, rather than any non-false, non-nilvalue, as is conventional in Ruby.This made it perilously easy to skip verification by accident.