-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Year-round species missing when week specified #211
Comments
We train our model with data for each week, but some training steps are made with |
Thanks for that explanation. I take it that there is therefore no way to set a week but not risk missing certain species? (We noticed this problem when very common species to us were absent in our original jobs - e.g. Tree Sparrow, Tawny Owl). If this is the case, could there be some notes explaining this added to the docs? |
Hint for species list
I'm not sure if this is a bug or by-design, but I've noticed that certain species which are listed as year-round do not appear in any weeks when a week filter is used.
To test this I ran
species.py --lat 55.7 --lon -3.4 --week X
48 times, replacing X with 1-48) to generate weekly lists, as well as with-1
to generate the year-round list, for my location in southern Scotland.I then compared the year-round list to the first week to identify any 'filtered' species. I then took the filtered results and compared to week 2, and so on through the year to find any filtered results that never appear in any weekly list. The following are the missing species:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: