-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In ServiceWorker mode, set the iframe src to display articles. #383
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I realize the code that provides the Service Worker with the content does its own resolveRedirect, but wouldn't it save a hop if we allowed this redirect code to run for both modes (jQuery and ServiceWorker) here, then set the iframe's src to the dirEntry.namespace + url of the new dirEntry? Maybe it's unlikely we'd actually encounter a redirect here? Anyway, just a thought.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it would certainly work and speed up a little bit.
It's completely possible to encounter a redirect here.
On the other hand, we would "only" save the binary search done by getDirEntryByTitle.
And we had here the opportunity to do things exactly the same between an article opened after a search (or a random search, or the main article), and an article opened while browsing (after a click on a hyperlink). If we handle the redirection differently, we re-introduce a little difference.
I'm torn between doing it or not (or doing it later). Maybe we should benchmark it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's very minor. I suggest doing it later if we find a need. If it saves anything, it would be a near-instantaneous lookup. I tried hitting the random button several times and typing misspellings of names into search several times, and I could never get the isRedirect code to fire in the code that provides the Service Worker with content.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK I created #384 for that, let's leave this portion as it is, for now.