-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove unnecessary functionality from the activator's codebase. #3494
Remove unnecessary functionality from the activator's codebase. #3494
Conversation
After introducing the throttling mechanism, a lot of the activator's functionality is no longer needed. In fact, the whole Activator interface is superfluous now.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: markusthoemmes The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@markusthoemmes: 0 warnings.
In response to this:
After introducing the throttling mechanism, a lot of the activator's functionality is no longer needed. In fact, the whole Activator interface is superfluous now.
Fixes #1573
Proposed Changes
After introducing the throttling mechanism, a lot of the activator's functionality is no longer needed. In fact, the whole Activator interface is superfluous now.
Release Note
NONE
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
/assign @vagababov |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Thanks for cleaning this up!
serviceName = revision.Labels[serving.ServiceLabelKey] | ||
} | ||
|
||
a.Reporter.ReportRequestCount(namespace, serviceName, configurationName, name, httpStatus, attempts, 1.0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this was here before, but do we want to report even if the names are empty?
Since this seems like a rouge request anyway?
/hold |
@vagababov I think I'd like to keep that as-is for this PR. /hold cancel |
/test pull-knative-serving-integration-tests |
After introducing the throttling mechanism, a lot of the activator's functionality is no longer needed. In fact, the whole Activator interface is superfluous now.
Fixes #1573
Proposed Changes
After introducing the throttling mechanism, a lot of the activator's functionality is no longer needed. In fact, the whole Activator interface is superfluous now.
Release Note