[TASK-1046] Add unit test for component

[pauloamorimbr]

Checklist

1. If you've added code that should be tested, add tests
2. If you've changed APIs, update (or create!) the documentation
3. Ensure the tests pass
4. Make sure that your code lints and that you've followed our coding style
5. Write a title and, if necessary, a description of your work suitable for publishing in our release notes
6. Mention any related issues in this repository (as #ISSUE) and in other repositories (as kobotoolbox/other#ISSUE)
7. Open an issue in the docs if there are UI/UX changes

Description

This commit creates the base configuration and samples for adding unit tests with Jest.
Simple tests were created for the Button and KoboSelect3 components as samples.

Notes

• Some new packages were added for jest to work
• Configuration for jest was added into /jsapp/jest
• 2 new scripts were created on package.json:
  • npm run jest
  • npm run jest-watch (Very useful when writing tests)
  • Both scripts can filter test files as in: npm run jest-watch -- Button
• To avoid confusion with mocha .tests.* file, we're using the .spec.* extension for tests.
• A test for the Button component was added checking for its interaction when enabled and disabled
• A test for the KoboSelect3 component was added checking for its mouse and keyboard interaction

[notion-workspace]

🏍️ UI Component Unit Tests, e.g. Data Table

[p2edwards]

📓 So ts-node lets us:

• write jest.config.ts in TypeScript instead of JavaScript
• launch it from npx jest --config ./jsapp/jest/jest.config.ts without an extra step

It's not strictly necessary but it's in the spirit of leveraging TypeScript. In the future we could apply this to Webpack. I looked into it:

• webpack
• eslint - experimentally supports something else called jiti

[p2edwards]

Let's add "ts-node": { "swc": true } to tsconfig.json.

Since ts-node has to transpile the config, it does affect test startup time a little bit.

		time npm run jest
As-is	jest.config.ts	2021 ms ± 23 ms
With swc: true	jest.config.ts	1156 ms ± 79 ms
Plain JS config	jest.config.mjs	989 ms ± 40 ms

benchmark

hyperfine --warmup 3 'npm run jest'

TypeScript, ts-node
  Time (mean ± σ):      2.021 s ±  0.023 s    [User: 3.671 s, System: 0.255 s]
  Range (min … max):    1.987 s …  2.066 s    10 runs

TypeScript, ts-node, `"ts-node": { "swc": true },`
  Time (mean ± σ):      1.156 s ±  0.079 s    [User: 1.454 s, System: 0.168 s]
  Range (min … max):    1.091 s …  1.285 s    10 runs

Plain JS (jest.config.mjs)
  Time (mean ± σ):     989.7 ms ±  39.7 ms    [User: 1254.6 ms, System: 129.9 ms]
  Range (min … max):   959.0 ms … 1092.9 ms    10 runs

[p2edwards]

We could add this to our GitHub CI (.github/workflows/npm-test.yml)

      # Run Jest component tests
      - name: Run Jest component tests
      - run: npx jest --config ./jsapp/jest/jest.config.ts --ci

Here, or in a separate PR.

[Akuukis]

Good catch, I think that's in the scope of adding jest to project, because normally all tests are always run on CI.

[pauloamorimbr]

I was thinking about doing this in a different PR, after some more tests were added. But I believe there's no problem doing so here anyways. 👍🏻

[p2edwards]

📓 Good point — many of our Kobo components are like this — 'controlled'-only. It'd be possible to make them more flexible.

• Cool article: Creating React Components that can be Controlled and Uncontrolled

'Course, then there would be more to test 😅

[pauloamorimbr]

It's a common practice I found for single component testing, since most of the components will depend on external context anyways. So I really don't think it's the case of making them 'uncontrolled' just for the sake of tests. We only need to be careful to not create biased tests that could influence the component behavior. (but yeah, cool article! 😄)

[pauloamorimbr]

Cool. Checks added the new tests already!