-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: use generic client in gitlab build tests #1421
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work! Left a few comments.
938970b
to
ed331dc
Compare
a41e73e
to
0540f8a
Compare
57e23b6
to
0e3bb66
Compare
0e3bb66
to
ca40b84
Compare
/retest |
ca40b84
to
063ae99
Compare
/retest |
/retest |
- Use generic, provider-agnostic, Git client functions leading to a nicer, more readable and maintainable code
063ae99
to
5ba26c5
Compare
/retest |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mmorhun, tisutisu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
It is currently not possible to merge a PR with multiple commits without squashing them. Created #1418 that should be merged before this, so we can avoid squashing
Description
Use generic, provider-agnostic, Git client functions leading to a nicer, more readable and maintainable code
Issue ticket number and link
N/A
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
./bin/e2e-appstudio --ginkgo.v --ginkgo.label-filter=build-service
Checklist: