Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ adding ability to run dep command during analysis command #531

Conversation

shawn-hurley
Copy link
Contributor

Make it so that the analysis command can also, in parallel can do the dependency output if desired

@shawn-hurley shawn-hurley marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2024 19:14
@shawn-hurley shawn-hurley force-pushed the feature/add-dep-output-to-analyzer-command branch from 09ca4e7 to a18830d Compare March 11, 2024 19:15
@shawn-hurley shawn-hurley force-pushed the feature/add-dep-output-to-analyzer-command branch from 151d1ea to 54cbc69 Compare March 11, 2024 19:38
@pranavgaikwad
Copy link
Contributor

pranavgaikwad commented Mar 11, 2024

@shawn-hurley we need the addon fix before merging this I think the failure in the e2e test is somethine else

@pranavgaikwad pranavgaikwad added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Mar 11, 2024
@shawn-hurley shawn-hurley force-pushed the feature/add-dep-output-to-analyzer-command branch from 54cbc69 to a9439aa Compare March 12, 2024 20:49
@shawn-hurley shawn-hurley merged commit e0b3756 into konveyor:main Mar 13, 2024
6 checks passed
aufi pushed a commit to aufi/analyzer-lsp that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
…#531)

Make it so that the analysis command can also, in parallel can do the
dependency output if desired

Signed-off-by: Shawn Hurley <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants