Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Don't use full konveyor.Dep for dependency Extras #566

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

eemcmullan
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@pranavgaikwad pranavgaikwad changed the title Don't use full konveyor.Dep for dependency Extras 🐛 Don't use full konveyor.Dep for dependency Extras Apr 4, 2024
Signed-off-by: Emily McMullan <[email protected]>
@aufi
Copy link
Member

aufi commented Apr 5, 2024

PR looks good, just for my curiosity, is it right understanding that the Extras field (map[string]interface) in analyzer codebase should not contain other more "complex" types like Dep, just other map, or there is some other reason? Thanks!

@pranavgaikwad
Copy link
Contributor

@aufi Not all complex fields are a problem only a certain fields that make grpc protobuf / json / yaml marshaling get confused on some nested fields. In this case, labels []string was being an issue

provider/provider.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@pranavgaikwad pranavgaikwad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

requesting a minor change

Signed-off-by: Emily McMullan <[email protected]>
@eemcmullan eemcmullan merged commit 988268d into konveyor:main Apr 5, 2024
6 checks passed
pranavgaikwad pushed a commit to pranavgaikwad/analyzer-lsp that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
pranavgaikwad pushed a commit to pranavgaikwad/analyzer-lsp that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
pranavgaikwad pushed a commit to pranavgaikwad/analyzer-lsp that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
pranavgaikwad pushed a commit to pranavgaikwad/analyzer-lsp that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants