Add well-known topology label

[ayberk]

Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
Feature

What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
See #729. This is the first part where we start writing the label and also give priority to it when reading topology labels. This change is completely backward-compatible with no change in behavior as far as users are concerned.

What testing is done?
Unit tests
Single AZ e2e (there was one failed case that should be unrelated, probably flake)

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ayberk

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [ayberk]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ayberk]

/assign @wongma7
/assign @AndyXiangLi

[k8s-ci-robot]

@ayberk: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: AndyXiangLi.

Note that only kubernetes-sigs members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time.
For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to this:

/assign @wongma7
/assign @AndyXiangLi

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[wongma7]

should we deprecate the region one as well? It seems like we only set it in the outposts case

[ayberk]

Hmm makes sense yeah. I didn't include it because as you said we only use it internally, but that would be more future-proof.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1728

• 15 of 15 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.09%) to 81.789%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 1714:	0.09%
Covered Lines:	1756
Relevant Lines:	2147

---

💛 - Coveralls

[AndyXiangLi]

LGTM, let's wait for another approval :-)

[wongma7]

/lgtm

[wongma7]

sorry I think you have to rebase since I moved some stuff to node_linux.go ...

[wongma7]

pkg/driver/node.go:27:2: imported and not used: "golang.org/x/sys/unix"
pkg/driver/node.go:36:2: volume redeclared as imported package name
	previous declaration at pkg/driver/node.go:28:2 

[wongma7]

/lgtm