Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove predefined availabilityZones from AKS e2e templates #5034

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor

@nojnhuh nojnhuh commented Jul 29, 2024

What type of PR is this?
/kind flake

What this PR does / why we need it:

This is a workaround for #5033 for the AKS e2e tests. Availability zones may dynamically have restrictions placed on them at a subscription level so we can't always depend on a specific set of zones to be available to all regions.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

  • cherry-pick candidate

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests

Release note:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 29, 2024
@jackfrancis
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 29, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 9481ce1cf5843b725f6b29df631925218ddea8a4

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jackfrancis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 29, 2024
@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 29, 2024

/cherry-pick release-1.16

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@nojnhuh: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.16 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.12%. Comparing base (89efbf3) to head (654bbb0).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5034      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   51.13%   51.12%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         274      274              
  Lines       24657    24657              
==========================================
- Hits        12609    12607       -2     
- Misses      11261    11263       +2     
  Partials      787      787              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 29, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 29, 2024
@@ -9,7 +9,5 @@ spec:
osDiskType: "Managed"
osDiskSizeGB: 30
enableNodePublicIP: false
enableUltraSSD: true
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Last test hit this:

      Availability zone is required for UltraSSD setting.: PUT https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/===REDACTED===/resourceGroups/capz-e2e-462egg-cc/providers/Microsoft.ContainerService/managedClusters/capz-e2e-462egg-cc-8qc6s
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      RESPONSE 400: 400 Bad Request
      ERROR CODE: ErrorCodeEnableUltraSSD
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      {
        "code": "ErrorCodeEnableUltraSSD",
        "details": null,
        "message": "Availability zone is required for UltraSSD setting.",
        "subcode": ""
      }
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

@willie-yao
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 29, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 53fd1ef750604ce14746fa2c175e9e403d5ad58f

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Jul 29, 2024

@nojnhuh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-dual-stack-with-ci-artifacts 1033f7e link false /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-dual-stack-with-ci-artifacts
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance 1033f7e link false /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-custom-builds 654bbb0 link false /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-custom-builds
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-custom-builds 654bbb0 link false /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-custom-builds
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e 654bbb0 link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-with-ci-artifacts 654bbb0 link false /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-with-ci-artifacts

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 29, 2024

#5026 Should resolve this with fewer template changes.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@nojnhuh: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

#5026 Should resolve this with fewer template changes.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@nojnhuh nojnhuh deleted the aks-e2e-zones branch September 20, 2024 03:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants