-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 426
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove predefined availabilityZones from AKS e2e templates #5034
Conversation
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 9481ce1cf5843b725f6b29df631925218ddea8a4
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jackfrancis The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherry-pick release-1.16 |
@nojnhuh: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.16 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5034 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 51.13% 51.12% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 274 274
Lines 24657 24657
==========================================
- Hits 12609 12607 -2
- Misses 11261 11263 +2
Partials 787 787 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
/lgtm |
@@ -9,7 +9,5 @@ spec: | |||
osDiskType: "Managed" | |||
osDiskSizeGB: 30 | |||
enableNodePublicIP: false | |||
enableUltraSSD: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Last test hit this:
Availability zone is required for UltraSSD setting.: PUT https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/===REDACTED===/resourceGroups/capz-e2e-462egg-cc/providers/Microsoft.ContainerService/managedClusters/capz-e2e-462egg-cc-8qc6s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESPONSE 400: 400 Bad Request
ERROR CODE: ErrorCodeEnableUltraSSD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
"code": "ErrorCodeEnableUltraSSD",
"details": null,
"message": "Availability zone is required for UltraSSD setting.",
"subcode": ""
}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 53fd1ef750604ce14746fa2c175e9e403d5ad58f
|
@nojnhuh: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
#5026 Should resolve this with fewer template changes. /close |
@nojnhuh: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind flake
What this PR does / why we need it:
This is a workaround for #5033 for the AKS e2e tests. Availability zones may dynamically have restrictions placed on them at a subscription level so we can't always depend on a specific set of zones to be available to all regions.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
TODOs:
Release note: