Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add backend protocol to implementers guide #3176

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

joerober
Copy link

What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds section on backend protocol selection to implementors guide explaining that backend protocol selection exists with link to user guide and link to supporting protocols in GEP-1911.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #2453

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. labels Jun 27, 2024
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jun 27, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @joerober!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @joerober. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 27, 2024
@dprotaso
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 28, 2024
@dprotaso
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 28, 2024
@dprotaso
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @youngnick @shaneutt @robscott

I believe this is the last bit for the backend protocol selection GEP.

@youngnick
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Copy link
Member

@robscott robscott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @joerober!


## Backend Protocol

Not all implementations of Gateway API support automatic protocol selection. In some cases protocols are disabled without an explicit opt-in.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: It would be good to reword this to focus on the context that this is the Implementer's Guide, and thus intended for implementers to read. What do implementers need to know about this feature? I think the focus in this guide should be to talk about how you might implement it, what this concept usually maps to in common underlying dataplanes like Envoy or NGINX, and where implementers can find more information (I think you already have that part in "References", but it might be good to have more specifics such as the well defined protocols that we recommend implementations support. It would also be good to include keywords such as websockets and HTTP/2 for implementers that may be looking for how to support these concepts with their Gateway API implementation.

@youngnick
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@shaneutt shaneutt self-requested a review September 18, 2024 13:11
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: joerober
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from robscott. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@joerober: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-gateway-api-verify 1934441 link true /test pull-gateway-api-verify

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@robscott
Copy link
Member

robscott commented Nov 5, 2024

Hey @joerober do you happen to have time to take another look at this one?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Backend Protocol Section to implementators guide
6 participants