-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove_default_searchdomains
inconsistent default value
#10533
remove_default_searchdomains
inconsistent default value
#10533
Conversation
Hi @yckaolalala. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
remove_default_searchdomains
inconsistent default default valueremove_default_searchdomains
inconsistent default value
/ok-to-test |
Thanks @yckaolalala for the PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yckaolalala Thank you for the PR 👍
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, yckaolalala The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #9948
Special notes for your reviewer:
when
remove_default_searchdomains
is undefined# remove_default_searchdomains: false
In ansible, default value is false .
In Jinja, if undefined, it does not match
remove_default_searchdomains is sameas false
, and the default value is true.Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: