Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Cherry-Pick] Use calico_pool_blocksize from cluster when existing (#10516) #10771

Conversation

cyclinder
Copy link
Contributor

The blockSize attribute from Calico IPPool resources cannot be changed once set 1. Consequently, we use the one currently defined when configuring the existing IPPool, avoiding upgrade errors by trying to change it.

In particular, this can be useful when calico_pool_blocksize default changes in kubespray, which would otherwise force users to add an explicit setting to their inventories.

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespaces from that line:

/kind api-change

/kind bug

/kind cleanup
/kind design
/kind documentation
/kind failing-test
/kind feature
/kind flake

What this PR does / why we need it:

The blockSize attribute from Calico IPPool resources cannot be changed
once set 1. Consequently, we use the one currently defined when
configuring the existing IPPool, avoiding upgrade errors by trying to
change it.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

#9055 (comment)

Special notes for your reviewer:

this PR cherry-pick #10516 to release-2.21

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:


…#10516)

The blockSize attribute from Calico IPPool resources cannot be changed
once set [1]. Consequently, we use the one currently defined when
configuring the existing IPPool, avoiding upgrade errors by trying to
change it.

In particular, this can be useful when calico_pool_blocksize default
changes in kubespray, which would otherwise force users to add an
explicit setting to their inventories.

[1]: https://docs.tigera.io/calico/latest/reference/resources/ippool#spec
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cyclinder
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mirwan for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 5, 2024
@floryut
Copy link
Member

floryut commented Jan 22, 2024

@cyclinder Thank you for merging this one

@floryut floryut merged commit e86c0cf into kubernetes-sigs:release-2.21 Jan 22, 2024
2 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants