-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
configure crio to use kube reserved cgroup #11028
configure crio to use kube reserved cgroup #11028
Conversation
Hi @pedro-peter. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good enough for me !
/lgtm
- kube_reserved is defined and kube_reserved is true | ||
- kube_reserved_cgroups_for_service_slice is defined |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really like this is defined
dance when we have role defaults, but given how our roles are layed out right now there is no way around it for now, unfortunately.
Since you notify the handler "Restart crio", that should not be a problem, it should be restarted if the task added the override. |
Thanks @pedro-peter |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: pedro-peter, yankay The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fix for #11027
I think enabling this feature was missed when support for crio was added.
It's enabled for docker using the docker systemd unit file:
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray/blob/master/roles/container-engine/docker/templates/docker.service.j2#L46
there is no ansible j2 template file for the crio systemd unit file as it's currently copied from the crio binary file to the host:
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray/blob/master/roles/container-engine/cri-o/tasks/main.yaml#L88
the best approach in this case seems to be to add a seperate
00-slice.conf
file.with this fix in place, crio will run the correct systemd cgroup slice.
Before:
After:
the kubelet errors:
also stop appearing in the logs once crio is restarted with this fix in place.
note: the fix only takes effect when the crio service is restarted. it may not take effect during cluster upgrades unless crio is upgraded (which triggers a crio restart)
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #11027
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: