Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add additional metadata configuration options to external Openstack CCM (kubernetes-sigs#6338) #6339

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 1, 2020

Conversation

Sryther
Copy link
Contributor

@Sryther Sryther commented Jun 29, 2020

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Additional configuration options for external OpenStack CCM:

  • Added Metadata configuration in cloud.conf which can be overriden:
    • Added parameter to change "search-order" value

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #6338

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 29, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Sryther. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 29, 2020
@Sryther
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sryther commented Jun 29, 2020

I change the author mail on my commit.

@Sryther
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sryther commented Jun 29, 2020

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Sryther: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@floryut
Copy link
Member

floryut commented Jun 29, 2020

@Sryther Thank you for the PR, could you please sign CLA ?
/ok-to-test
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 29, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 29, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please sign in with your organization's credentials at https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf to be authorized.
  • If you have done the above and are still having issues with the CLA being reported as unsigned, please log a ticket with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk: https://support.linuxfoundation.org/
  • Should you encounter any issues with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk, send a message to the backup e-mail support address at: [email protected]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 29, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 29, 2020
@alijahnas
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, you tested this against which OpenStack version? and which OpenStack CCM version? Thanks.

@Sryther
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sryther commented Jun 29, 2020

I tested this with OpenStack CCM 1.18.1 and OpenStack (Nova) 2.38.

@@ -57,3 +57,6 @@ internal-network-name="{{ network_name }}"
{% for network_name in external_openstack_network_public_networks %}
public-network-name="{{ network_name }}"
{% endfor %}

[Metadata]
search-order="{{ external_openstack_metadata_search_order }}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we wrap this with if external_openstack_metadata_search_order is defined ? and make the default value being undefined?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Anyway if the value is undefined, the cloud-provider-openstack will use by default search-order=configDrive,metadataService as mentionned here.

Are you sure you removing the default value won't be ambiguous?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you think @alijahnas ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The default value of configDrive,metadataService is the right one for most deployments. I am not sure in which cases these values will need to be specifically defined. Maybe for optimization.
If the default value of the CCM is the same as the one declared in kubespray-defaults, adding the line won't affect much. I am okay with @Miouge1 to add the wrapping if external_openstack_metadata_search_order is defined and remove the default. The commented group_vars variable is enough I think.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright then, I did the changes :).

@Miouge1
Copy link
Contributor

Miouge1 commented Jun 30, 2020

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Miouge1, Sryther

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 30, 2020
@alijahnas
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!
/lgtm
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 1, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 1, 2020
@Sryther
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sryther commented Jul 1, 2020

I rebased because a test was timing out.

@floryut
Copy link
Member

floryut commented Jul 1, 2020

As @alijahnas already lgtm this, let's merge
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 1, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit bcac3c6 into kubernetes-sigs:master Jul 1, 2020
erulabs added a commit to kubesail/kubespray that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2020
* 'master' of https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray:
  Patch Calico for V3.14.0 missing CR and CRD (kubernetes-sigs#6276)
  Explicitly set ETCDCTL_API and use ETCDCTL_ENDPOINTS (kubernetes-sigs#6327)
  Add additional metadata configuration options to external Openstack CCM (kubernetes-sigs#6338) (kubernetes-sigs#6339)
LuckySB pushed a commit to southbridgeio/kubespray that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2020
…CM (kubernetes-sigs#6338) (kubernetes-sigs#6339)

* Add additional metadata configuration option to external Openstack CCM (kubernetes-sigs#6338)

* Set the variable external_openstack_metadata_search_order undefined by default
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Metadata section for external-openstack-cloud-config's cloud.conf in templates
5 participants