-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added pprof endpoint #978
Added pprof endpoint #978
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Hi @stuton. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign @trasc |
/lgtm |
/ok-to-test |
// PprofBindAddress is the TCP address that the controller should bind to | ||
// for serving pprof. | ||
// It can be set to "" or "0" to disable the pprof serving. | ||
// Since pprof may contain sensitive information, make sure to protect it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we are not exposing this port through a Service, it can only be used if you ssh into node to attach to the port, right?
Did you have a chance to test it?
Can you include some documentation? Although that can be done in a separate PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my mind, usually port-forward
command is enough to reach the port of pod to surf web part (or cli) of pprof or even to take a dump. For security reasons it's better nothing to expose out of the cluster. #983
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah yes, port-forward seems reasonable.
/approve
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, stuton The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #486
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?