Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gather use cases for service accounts as selectors #274

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya tssurya commented Nov 19, 2024

This came from discussions at KubeCon, I want to make sure they are captured here correctly.
Closes: #173

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 19, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tssurya
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign aojea for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 19, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-network-policy-api ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 23d6732
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-network-policy-api/deploys/673c620d41d28800084c0851
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-274--kubernetes-sigs-network-policy-api.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.


## Non-Goals

* There might be other identity management constructs like SPIFFE IDs which are outside the scope of this enhancement. We can only provide a way to select constructs known to core Kubernetes.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implementor bottlenecks - since implementations might not want to consume the whole CRD...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there was a conclusion at kubecon that it makes more sense for it to be a new CRD?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what about L7 layer CRD instead of the L3/L4 matches since if its in the policy its usually for L4/L3 IP based matches

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ENHANCEMENT] Support for ServiceAccount Match
2 participants