-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Moving kubectl package code to staging #1020
Comments
/stage stable |
Hey, @soltysh 👋 I'm the v1.15 docs Lead. Just a friendly reminder we're looking for a PR against k/website (branch dev-1.15) due by Thursday, May 30th. It would be great if it's the start of the full documentation, but even a placeholder PR is acceptable. Let me know if you have any questions! |
Hi @soltysh . Code Freeze is Thursday, May 30th 2019 @ EOD PST. All enhancements going into the release must be code-complete, including tests, and have docs PRs open. Please list all current k/k PRs so they can be tracked going into freeze. If the PRs aren't merged by freeze, this feature will slip for the 1.15 release cycle. Only release-blocking issues and PRs will be allowed in the milestone. If you know this will slip, please reply back and let us know. Thanks! |
Hi @soltysh , today is code freeze. I do not see a reply for any PRs to track for this merge. It's now being marked as At Risk in the 1.15 Enhancement Tracking Sheet. If there is no response, or you respond with PRs to track and they are not merged by EOD PST, this will be dropped from the 1.15 Milestone. After this point, only release-blocking issues and PRs will be allowed in the milestone with an exception. |
/milestone clear |
Hi @soltysh , We're beginning the 1.16 Enhancement collection. Is this going to be moving to stable in 1.16? Enhancement Freeze is 7/30. |
Hello @soltysh -- 1.17 Enhancement Shadow here! 🙂 I wanted to reach out to see if this enhancement will be graduating to alpha/beta/stable in 1.17?
Thank you! 🔔Friendly Reminder The current release schedule is Monday, September 23 - Release Cycle Begins |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Hey there @soltysh -- 1.18 Enhancements shadow here. I wanted to check in and see if you think this Enhancement will be implemented in 1.18? The current release schedule is: Monday, January 6th - Release Cycle Begins To be included in the release, this enhancement must have a merged KEP in the If you would like to include this enhancement, once coding begins please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly. 👍 We'll be tracking enhancements here: http://bit.ly/k8s-1-18-enhancements |
@johnbelamaric this is still on-going work, it's not finished but we're actively working on it. It described in details in https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-cli/kubectl-staging.md |
Hi @soltysh ! Enhancements Lead here, do you still intend to target this for stable in 1.20? Thanks! |
Moving this to tracked since after digging I see that there is an active PR: kubernetes/kubernetes#92507 |
Hi @soltysh, do we still plan to target this for stable in 1.20? I notice there is a Also, time permitting, can we please update the KEP to the new format detailed here https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/NNNN-kep-template? The Enhancements Freeze deadline for that update would be October 6th. Thank you everyone for your work on this! Regards, |
This is in-progress, it's currently waiting for the repo creation which should happen in the next few days. Overall - yes, once the above merges we're hoping to split the code that's blocking us and should move to staging fully. /milestone v1.20 |
Updated KEP to the new template is in #2027 |
Thank you for updating the KEP to the new format @soltysh ! I just saw that it merged 💯 |
Hi @soltysh , Since your Enhancement is scheduled to be in 1.20, please keep in mind the important upcoming dates: As a reminder, please link all of your k/k PR as well as docs PR to this issue so we can track them. Regards, |
No docs are required for this particular enhacement. This is only about internal code organization. |
Hello @soltysh @seans3 @pwittrock, 1.20 Docs shadow here 👋🏽. If so, please follows the steps here to open a PR against Also take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release. |
Like mentioned before, we're not planning any doc changes, this is modifying internal code. |
All right. Noted! |
Hi @soltysh Please keep in mind the important upcoming dates:
As a reminder, please link all of your k/k PR as well as docs PR to this issue for the release team to track. |
|
Hey @soltysh 👋 Friendly reminder that, in order to make the 1.20 milestone, we have to have k/k PR #96190 in by code freeze or an exception will need to be made. Important upcoming date:
Thank you! |
@soltysh looks like kubernetes/kubernetes#96190 is fully approved and passing, does it need to be rekicked or something to merge? Actually looking closer it's rerunning bazel test I guess.. |
The above PR merged! Looks like this is finished for 1.20 code freeze. 👍 |
Hi @soltysh 1.21 Enhancement Lead here. Can you update the
Once that merges, we can close out this issue. |
I'll be updating that next week. |
Hey @soltysh, a friendly reminder to update the |
@annajung just updated, see linked PR where I also tagged you. |
Looks like it was just merged! Thank you @soltysh /close |
@annajung: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Enhancement Description
Moving kubectl package code to staging
https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-cli/kubectl-staging.md
There are no particular milestones to be achieved here, the end goal is to split kubectl into a separate repository but that will be outlined in separate enhancement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: