Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix preventTargetPoolToRBSMigration. Properly delete annotation #1741

Merged

Conversation

panslava
Copy link
Contributor

Fixing bug introduces in PR #1740: RBS annotation was not deleted from Target Pool services

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 23, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 23, 2022
@panslava panslava changed the title Fix preventTargetPoolToRBSMigration. Properly delete annotation WIP Fix preventTargetPoolToRBSMigration. Properly delete annotation Jun 23, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 23, 2022
@panslava panslava force-pushed the prevent-target-pool-to-rbs-migration branch from ee46b1f to bb667a6 Compare June 23, 2022 16:26
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 23, 2022
Fixing bug introduces in PR kubernetes#1740: RBS annotation was not deleted from
Target Pool services
@panslava panslava force-pushed the prevent-target-pool-to-rbs-migration branch from bb667a6 to 4a8529a Compare June 23, 2022 16:29
@panslava panslava changed the title WIP Fix preventTargetPoolToRBSMigration. Properly delete annotation Fix preventTargetPoolToRBSMigration. Properly delete annotation Jun 23, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 23, 2022
@cezarygerard
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cezarygerard, panslava

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [cezarygerard,panslava]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 23, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 50bc49f into kubernetes:master Jun 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants