Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use namer.L4Firewall and namer.L4Backend instead of servicePort #1821

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2022

Conversation

panslava
Copy link
Contributor

It is better to have single source of naming, which is L4Namer in l4netlb
This PR changes getting Backend Service name and Firewall name with using namer, instead of ServicePort
This PR also helps to add DualStack implementation

/assign @kl52752

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 18, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 18, 2022

name := l4netlb.ServicePort.BackendName()
bsName := l4netlb.namer.L4Backend(l4netlb.Service.Namespace, l4netlb.Service.Name)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is ServicePort used after this refactoring? If not maybe you should delete it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, good catch, done,
but it needed to move a bit of logic upper to l4netlbcontroller, so now it's also changed

@panslava
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign cezarygerard

@kl52752
Copy link
Contributor

kl52752 commented Oct 3, 2022

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 3, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 42eca78 into kubernetes:master Oct 3, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kl52752, panslava

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants