-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
helm: ServiceMonitor: sane default namespaceSelector #7998
helm: ServiceMonitor: sane default namespaceSelector #7998
Conversation
Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA. It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Welcome @awoimbee! |
Hi @awoimbee. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/check-cla |
@awoimbee please sign the CLA from linuxfoundation as well |
@cpanato I don't understand, the bot says I signed the CLA ? (#7998 (comment)) |
OK, well, I hate both this bot that keeps spamming and this whole CLA signing process hell. |
/ok-to-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm just missing the chart version bump
@cpanato please let's get this over with |
/triage accepted |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: awoimbee, cpanato, rikatz The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
* helm: service-monitor: sane default namespaceSelector * chart version bump (4.0.16)
What this PR does / why we need it:
Makes it so that the ServiceMonitor looks for the crontroller pods in the correct namespace by default. In most, if not all setups, the ServiceMonitor is deployed to the
monitoring
namespace and is targeting the controller deployed in the{{ .Release.Namespace }}
namespace.I believe that with we could even remove
.Values.controller.metrics.serviceMonitor.namespaceSelector
, but that would be breaking.Types of changes
Which issue/s this PR fixes
Fixes #7989
How Has This Been Tested?
I ran
helm template
, then deployed (k8s 1.21).Checklist: