Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

helm: ServiceMonitor: sane default namespaceSelector #7998

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2022
Merged

helm: ServiceMonitor: sane default namespaceSelector #7998

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2022

Conversation

awoimbee
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

Makes it so that the ServiceMonitor looks for the crontroller pods in the correct namespace by default. In most, if not all setups, the ServiceMonitor is deployed to the monitoring namespace and is targeting the controller deployed in the {{ .Release.Namespace }} namespace.

I believe that with we could even remove .Values.controller.metrics.serviceMonitor.namespaceSelector, but that would be breaking.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation only

Which issue/s this PR fixes

Fixes #7989

How Has This Been Tested?

I ran helm template, then deployed (k8s 1.21).

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTION guide
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please sign in with your organization's credentials at https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf to be authorized.
  • If you have done the above and are still having issues with the CLA being reported as unsigned, please log a ticket with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk: https://support.linuxfoundation.org/
  • Should you encounter any issues with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk, send a message to the backup e-mail support address at: [email protected]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 30, 2021
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Nov 30, 2021

CLA Signed

The committers are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ Arthur Woimbée (e9e108c9d22871cfd69a0bad7984fc866a3e83c7)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label Nov 30, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @awoimbee!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 30, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @awoimbee. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 30, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/helm Issues or PRs related to helm charts label Nov 30, 2021
@kundan2707
Copy link
Contributor

kundan2707 commented Dec 4, 2021

/check-cla

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Dec 4, 2021

@awoimbee please sign the CLA from linuxfoundation as well

@awoimbee
Copy link
Contributor Author

awoimbee commented Dec 6, 2021

@cpanato I don't understand, the bot says I signed the CLA ? (#7998 (comment))
TBH I don't remember what I signed, but I signed a lot, and I signed both as a corporate and as a personal contributor since it didn't work.
What else could I need to sign ?!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 6, 2021
@awoimbee
Copy link
Contributor Author

awoimbee commented Dec 6, 2021

OK, well, I hate both this bot that keeps spamming and this whole CLA signing process hell.

@rikatz
Copy link
Contributor

rikatz commented Dec 30, 2021

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 30, 2021
Copy link
Member

@cpanato cpanato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm just missing the chart version bump

@awoimbee awoimbee requested a review from cpanato January 3, 2022 08:08
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 12, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 17, 2022
@awoimbee
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cpanato please let's get this over with

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Jan 17, 2022

/triage accepted
/priority important-soon
/kind cleanup

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 17, 2022
Copy link
Member

@cpanato cpanato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 17, 2022
@rikatz
Copy link
Contributor

rikatz commented Jan 17, 2022

/lgtm
@cpanato forgot ;)
Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: awoimbee, cpanato, rikatz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 17, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a665a40 into kubernetes:main Jan 17, 2022
@tao12345666333 tao12345666333 mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2022
rchshld pushed a commit to joomcode/ingress-nginx that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
* helm: service-monitor: sane default namespaceSelector

* chart version bump (4.0.16)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/helm Issues or PRs related to helm charts cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Helm Chart: Default namespaceSelector for serviceMonitor
5 participants