Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[cluster/gce] Target the correct project while adding kubeconfig metadata to the master #99691

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2021

Conversation

amwat
Copy link
Contributor

@amwat amwat commented Mar 3, 2021

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #99690

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


/cc @BenTheElder @spiffxp @mm4tt

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 3, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@amwat: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 3, 2021
Copy link
Member

@spiffxp spiffxp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm
This seems like it may exacerbate kubernetes/k8s.io#1751? Let's find out

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 3, 2021
@amwat
Copy link
Contributor Author

amwat commented Mar 4, 2021

I think kubernetes/k8s.io#1751 might be a bit different since that's to do with ssh-keys which get automatically created/propagate to the VM metadata whenever we run gcloud compute ssh

whereas this one is to do with us manually adding additional metadata related to kubeconfig (which @mm4tt probbably knows more about)

Unless we are also leaking this kubeconfig metadata in the audit 🤔 (@spiffxp ?)

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Mar 4, 2021

Unless we are also leaking this kubeconfig metadata in the audit 🤔 (@spiffxp ?)

I haven't seen anything like that show up in our audit output. We should be fine. Thanks for explaining the ssh key stuff on that issue

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 4, 2021

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2021
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 4, 2021

/hold cancel
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2021
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

cc @cheftako

Copy link

@ohbus ohbus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ohbus: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: amwat, ohbus, spiffxp

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9d353ef into kubernetes:master Mar 4, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.21 milestone Mar 4, 2021
@amwat amwat deleted the metadata-project branch March 4, 2021 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[cluster/gce] Missing --project while adding kubeconfig metadata
6 participants