Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix workflow #608

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2024
Merged

fix workflow #608

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

YiscahLevySilas1
Copy link
Collaborator

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 commented Mar 21, 2024

User description

Overview


Type

enhancement


Description

  • Enhanced the GitHub Actions workflow by adding outputs for artifact key name and path in the build-and-rego-test job.
  • Updated the DOWNLOAD_ARTIFACT_PATH to utilize the outputs from the build-and-rego-test job, ensuring a more dynamic and reliable artifact handling in the workflow.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Enhancement
create-release-v2.yaml
Enhance GitHub Actions Workflow for Release Process           

.github/workflows/create-release-v2.yaml

  • Added outputs for REGO_ARTIFACT_KEY_NAME and REGO_ARTIFACT_PATH in the
    build-and-rego-test job.
  • Updated DOWNLOAD_ARTIFACT_PATH to use the output from
    build-and-rego-test job.
  • +4/-1     

    PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <[email protected]>
    @codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 21, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Description updated to latest commit (9ac7af8)

    @YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 merged commit f47888e into master Mar 21, 2024
    24 checks passed
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Review

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the changes are focused on a specific part of the workflow configuration and involve a clear enhancement in terms of artifact handling. The modifications are straightforward and localized to the GitHub Actions workflow file, which simplifies the review process.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues

    Missing Step Definition: The PR adds outputs REGO_ARTIFACT_KEY_NAME and REGO_ARTIFACT_PATH in the build-and-rego-test job but does not include the step set_outputs that sets these outputs. This omission could lead to an error when the workflow tries to access these outputs.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No


    ✨ Review tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_reviewer]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Utilizing extra instructions

    The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_reviewer] # /review #
    extra_instructions="""
    In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    How to enable\disable automation
    • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
    pr_commands = ["/review", ...]
    

    meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
    Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

    Auto-labels

    The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

    • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
    • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
    Extra sub-tools

    The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
    It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
    Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
    require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, require_can_be_split_review, and more.

    Auto-approve PRs

    By invoking:

    /review auto_approve
    

    The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

    To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

    [pr_reviewer]
    enable_auto_approval = true
    

    (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

    You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

    [pr_reviewer]
    maximal_review_effort = 5
    
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Mar 21, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions

    CategorySuggestions                                                                                                                                                       
    Possible issue
    Add a step to define the set_outputs outputs used in the outputs section.

    Ensure that the steps.set_outputs referenced in the outputs section of the
    build-and-rego-test job are defined within the steps of that job. If not already present,
    you need to add a step that correctly initializes these outputs, typically using a custom
    action or a run command that sets them. This is crucial for the workflow to correctly pass
    these values to subsequent jobs or steps.

    .github/workflows/create-release-v2.yaml [33-35]

    -outputs:
    -  REGO_ARTIFACT_KEY_NAME: ${{ steps.set_outputs.outputs.REGO_ARTIFACT_KEY_NAME }}
    -  REGO_ARTIFACT_PATH: ${{ steps.set_outputs.outputs.REGO_ARTIFACT_PATH }}
    +steps:
    +  - id: set_outputs
    +    run: echo "::set-output name=REGO_ARTIFACT_KEY_NAME::$(<some-command>)" # Example command
    +    run: echo "::set-output name=REGO_ARTIFACT_PATH::$(<some-command>)" # Example command
     
    Best practice
    Ensure the REGO_ARTIFACT_PATH output is correctly set and accessible.

    Verify that the needs.build-and-rego-test.outputs.REGO_ARTIFACT_PATH is correctly set and
    used. If the build-and-rego-test job fails or does not correctly set the
    REGO_ARTIFACT_PATH output, this step will not work as expected. Consider adding error
    handling or checks to ensure that the artifact path is valid and accessible before using
    it.

    .github/workflows/create-release-v2.yaml [111]

     DOWNLOAD_ARTIFACT_PATH: ${{ needs.build-and-rego-test.outputs.REGO_ARTIFACT_PATH }}
    +if: ${{ needs.build-and-rego-test.outputs.REGO_ARTIFACT_PATH != '' }}
     

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Enabling\disabling automation

    When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

    pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]
    

    meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

    Utilizing extra instructions

    Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
    extra_instructions="""
    Emphasize the following aspects:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    A note on code suggestions quality
    • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
    • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
    • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
    • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Summary:

    • License scan: failure
    • Credentials scan: failure
    • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
    • Unit test: success
    • Go linting: success

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants