-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Filter vuln host list cves and show assessment by severity #375
Merged
dmurray-lacework
merged 15 commits into
main
from
dmurray-lacework/vuln-host-severity-flag
Apr 9, 2021
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
407ebd9
feat: Filter vuln host list cves by severity
dmurray-lacework 74ec9d6
style: declare vars in block
dmurray-lacework fb71605
refactor: Address code review comments
dmurray-lacework 99c2bf5
feat: Filter vuln host show-assessment by severity
dmurray-lacework ad04c0e
feat: Filter by severity when packages flag is enabled
dmurray-lacework b90ac84
test: Add additional vuln host severity filter tests
dmurray-lacework 42ba24d
fix: Host count
dmurray-lacework 9676f75
fix: Host count
dmurray-lacework 73dcbfd
fix: Remove negligible severity status
dmurray-lacework ec20225
fix: Output when no vulns are found with severity flag
dmurray-lacework 3687c1a
fix: Use correct types for formatted string
dmurray-lacework 80293c5
fix: Use correct types for formatted string
dmurray-lacework 287e42c
fix: Use correct types for formatted string
dmurray-lacework 6ebb2b7
test: fix unit test
dmurray-lacework ee9c596
test: fix unit test
dmurray-lacework File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Everytime I read this footer I feel it looks way better if we type it like:
But maybe this is just me.....
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I quite like this way, with the most important details first. But open to be persuaded otherwise.
showing 1 of 100 package(s)
vs
1 of 100 package(s) showing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
all good, this is just my bad English 😂