Eigenda implementation merge main #271
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…#2824) ## What ❔ Passthrough env vars to the SGX enclave. Relevant logs showcasing the issue: https://grafana.matterlabs.dev/goto/1iFHMIeIg?orgId=1 ## Why ❔ To fix the bug. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Add setup keys step to prover init
…s#2800) ## What ❔ Add `--docker` flag for `zk_inception prover run` which will allow prover components to run from docker images. ## Why ❔ To decrease setup time/improve UX ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Adds README for verified sources fetcher ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Limits rayon threadpool size to 2 and tokio threadpool size to 4 in zk_toolbox CI. I have checked locally, and with this configuration time to run integration tests is pretty close to the default configuration. ## Why ❔ By default, both tokio and rayon will try to use all the CPUs. When we run multiple Rust binaries at the same time (3 servers and 3 ENs in our case), it causes a lot of conflict for resources, regardless of the number of CPUs.
Extraction of the attester committee from consensus registry state. If consensus registry address is not specified, we fall back to attester committee from genesis. This pr does NOT enable the dynamic attestation, as the registry address needs to be added to the main node config first. --------- Co-authored-by: Moshe Shababo <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Igor Aleksanov <[email protected]>
## What ❔ - Removes a data race from the revert integration test (a single node one); a batch gets executed after it is verified that not all batches are executed. - Removes copy-paste between single-node and EN tests. - Structures revert tests into smaller steps. ## Why ❔ Makes the test less flaky and easier to maintain. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
…atter-labs#2804) ## What ❔ - Fixes the "missing revert data" error by updating the used reth Docker image. The error is probably caused by [this issue](paradigmxyz/reth#7381) fixed in the new reth versions. - Removes "web3 API compatibility tests › Should check API returns error when there are too many logs in eth_getLogs" test as fundamentally flaky and able to poison other tests. - Adds logging for upgrade test to investigate L1 "nonce too low" errors. ## Why ❔ Flaky CI bad. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
…labs#2806) ## What ❔ Extracts oneshot VM executor to the executor crate. ## Why ❔ To make executor logic more reusable and maintainable. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
…abs#2836) ## What ❔ - Fixes DB connection starvation during snapshot recovery. Caused by the insufficient number of connections in the DB pool provided to recovery logic. - Additionally, fixes max concurrency of recovery not being set. ## Why ❔ Connection starvation errors degrade UX. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
When a method is missing: proxyd returns HTTP 403: methodnotfound while api server returns HTTP 200: methodnotfound we need to handle both.
`zks t i` now accepts a `-t` flag that can can be used to specify a pattern. Only matching tests are run.
## What ❔ Resolves matter-labs#2783 ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
…r-labs#2830) ## What - Removes `locate_workspace` and `workspace_dir_or_current_dir` methods. - Instead, introduces `Workspace` type that is aware of different Cargo workspaces in the codebase. ## Why The approach with a single `locate_workspace` doesn't work well for our codebase, since we have multiple workspaces. It resulted in some very implicit and convoluted code (see the removed `get_base_dir` in prover workspace). New approach handles all 3 workspaces _plus_ the lack of a workspace.
## What ❔ Add prover subcommand for `zk_supervisor`. Add the following subcommand: * `zk_supervisor prover info` - Prints information about current prover setup. * `zk_supervisor prover insert-version` - Insert new protocol version in prover database(integration with `prover_cli`). * `zk_supervisor prover insert-batch` - Insert new batch in prover database(integration with `prover_cli`). Add automatic creation of `prover/artifacts/witness_inputs` dirs if the storage is file backed on init. ## Why ❔ To improve UX of working with provers. ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ <!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? --> <!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. --> <!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) --> ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`. Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
## What ❔ * Reduced uncompressed size from 7.5GB to 4.81 GB. * Changes to make zk_environment image smaller * compile solc with release mode * remove unnecessary components from google cli * build things first, and then only copy the artifacts. ## Why ❔ * This image is used on ALL of our CI builds - so reducing its size will speed up the CIs.
## What ❔ Fix getting chain config in zk_supervisor prover Fix artifacts path when initializing. Setup data path for provers ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ `cargo install --list` doesn't work properly in CI because we copy only binaries to zk-environment also increase reth block-time and fixes upgrade-test which improves tests stability ## Why ❔ we rely on cargo-nextest in tests ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔
This PR changes the approach to managing 3rd party DA clients. It was
assumed before that they will be stored in a separate repository
(hyperchain-da), but to simplify the processes and solve a recursive
dependency problem, we decided to manage those within `zksync-era`.
The config now defines which DA client will be used, for proto-based
configuration it requires adding these lines to general.yaml:
```
da_client:
avail:
api_node_url: wss://turing-rpc.avail.so/ws
bridge_api_url: undefined
seed: SEED_PHRASE
app_id: 82
timeout: 3
max_retries: 5
```
for env-based:
```
DA_CLIENT="Avail"
DA_API_NODE_URL="localhost:12345"
DA_BRIDGE_API_URL="localhost:54321"
DA_SEED="SEED_PHRASE"
DA_APP_ID=1
DA_TIMEOUT=2
DA_MAX_RETRIES=3
```
If no config is provided - the default behavior is to use NoDA client
(same as now).
The `da_client` config might be merged with `da_dispatcher` at some
point as the second depends on the first one, so their separation does
not make much sense (apart from simplification of the configs). But I'd
prefer to do it as a separate PR in case we decide to merge them.
The client was reimplemented using only lightweight libraries from
crates.io, so it doesn't have any visible impact on build time.
## Why ❔
To enable seamless integration with 3rd party DA clients in
`zksync-era`.
## Checklist
<!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. -->
<!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. -->
- [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog
entries from PRs).
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
- [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated.
- [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Support legacy bridges in zk toolbox ## Why ❔ We still have some legacy bridges in production, so we have to have an opportunity to test it ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`. --------- Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
## What ❔ Add external_node consensus support --------- Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Danil <[email protected]>
## What ❔ * A small tool to generate the selector hashes based on the ABI from json files ## Why ❔ * The output json can be useful for humans to better understand some of the errors (and calldata) * It can also be read by our tools, to make the debugging easier. In the future, we could call this tool regularly on each contracts version change, but for now it can stay as manual.
## What ❔ - Loads setup keys to memory in parallel (for GPU prover only). - Refactors a bunch of related code for simplicity. ## Why ❔ - Locally I've observed load time going from ~30s to ~12s, so ~60% improvement for prover start time. - Readability & maintainability. ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ - Use latest versions of crypto, protocol, gpu, and consensus crates. - Remove solved cargo deny advisories from the allowlist. ## Why ❔ - A bunch of fixes/improvements were done. - Optimization of dependency graph. - Solving cargo deny advisories.
## What ❔ Introduce new structure for witness generators. Introduce `ArtifactsManager` trait responsible for operations with object store and artifacts. ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ <!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? --> <!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. --> <!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) --> ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`. --------- Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
…matter-labs#2859) Account validation counts all the precompile's extra gas costs. This PR adds a missing precompile.
## What ❔ Updates the fast VM revision to incorporate latest changes. ## Why ❔ Mainly to check that these changes work. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Add CUDA ARCH 80 to list of CUDA archs. ## Why ❔ To be able to run provers on A100. ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Pass CUDA_ARCH to compressor image build. ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Strip `zksync_tee_prover` binary for nix package. ## Why ❔ Somehow llvm decided to produce different symbol names each build ```diff - 12916: 000000000194d628 48 OBJECT LOCAL HIDDEN 23 anon.c880a573512c356e53163839ee7cd669.742.llvm.17979232152659092167 + 12916: 000000000194d628 48 OBJECT LOCAL HIDDEN 23 anon.c880a573512c356e53163839ee7cd669.742.llvm.14235143304249741099 [...] ``` Remove those to make the builds reproducible again. ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`. Signed-off-by: Harald Hoyer <[email protected]>
## What ❔ - `get_events_inner` should recursively call itself - `get_events_inner` should allow passing `None` as topics and/or addresses ## Why ❔ bug fix ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
) ## What ❔ Various minor improvements to VM runner / VM playground: - Get batch storage asynchronously, so that it works efficiently with snapshot storage. - Add metrics / logs to ensure that snapshot storage works as expected. ## Why ❔ Improves usability. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ <!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? --> <!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. --> <!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) --> Increase confirmations in testing. ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> Should make CI workflows less flaky. ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
Modifies the version message to include stuff like git commit, branch, build timestamp, and submodules versions (non-recursive). Sample output: ``` $ zki --version zk_inception v0.1.0-c03229138 Branch: popzxc-version-with-git-commit Submodules: - contracts: 3a1b5d4b94ffb00f03d436a7db7e48589eb74d39 Build timestamp: 2024-09-16 12:07:09 ```
matter-labs#2886) ## What ❔ Resumes an incomplete snapshot in the snapshot creator if the creator config doesn't specify an L1 batch. ## Why ❔ This effectively reverts the relevant changes from matter-labs#2256. It makes the snapshot creator resilient by default without additional setup, at the cost of parallel creator jobs working incorrectly (unless they all specify L1 batches). ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
) ## What ❔ Adding installation of sccache to build-base Dockerfile ## Why ❔ To speed-up docker builds ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔
- Changes procedural approach to more idiomatic for rust (introduces
`Selectors` + `App` structures). `Selectors` are not FS aware, `App` is.
- Introduces more strong typing -- when both selectors and function
names are `String`, it's easy to misuse them (I did several times, while
working on this PR).
- Removes manual selector calculation and uses `ethabi` for that.
- Makes the code async.
- Adds docs for CLI (e.g. to see with `--help` argument).
- Adds a test for `Selectors`.
- Reduces number of panics and uses `anyhow` to propagate errors.
- Adds new selectors (I guess I have more contracts compiled locally).
## Why ❔
Maintainability and testability, mostly. With the refactoring, it should
be easier to add new functionality and tests for it.
Also, the runtime has improved.
Before
```
$ time cargo run --bin selector_generator -- contracts etc/selector-generator-data/selectors.json
Compiling selector_generator v0.1.0 (/home/popzxc/workspace/current/zksync-era/core/bin/selector_generator)
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.54s
Running `target/debug/selector_generator contracts etc/selector-generator-data/selectors.json`
Analyzed 401 files. Added 452 selectors (before: 516 after: 968)
cargo run --bin selector_generator -- contracts 4.48s user 7.02s system 100% cpu 11.486 total
```
After
```
$ time cargo run --bin selector_generator -- contracts etc/selector-generator-data/selectors.json
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.20s
Running `target/debug/selector_generator contracts etc/selector-generator-data/selectors.json`
Analyzed 1087 files. Added 0 selectors (before: 1023 after: 1023)
cargo run --bin selector_generator -- contracts 1.24s user 0.12s system 100% cpu 1.360 total
```
## Next steps
I would love to see `--check` mode introduced (which checks that 0 new
entries were added) and this tool is added to CI, so that we continously
run it and prevent from rotting. @mm-zk leaving it to you.
) ## What ❔ <!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? --> <!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. --> <!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) --> Add `zki ecosystem build` subcommand, which builds L1 transactions without signing and broadcasting them. This allows a security team to sign them using keys in cold storage and multisig. ```bash Create transactions to build ecosystem contracts Usage: zki ecosystem build-transactions [OPTIONS] Options: --sender <SENDER> Address of the transaction sender --l1-rpc-url <L1_RPC_URL> L1 RPC URL -o, --out <OUT> Output directory for the generated files -h, --help Print help (see a summary with '-h') ``` ```bash Create unsigned transactions for chain deployment Usage: zki chain build-transactions [OPTIONS] Options: -o, --out <OUT> Output directory for the generated files -h, --help Print help (see a summary with '-h') ``` ### Output ```json # /transactions/deploy.json { "transactions": [ { "hash": null, "transactionType": "CREATE", "contractName": null, "contractAddress": "0xddca24376aa96d8f56667d78306a3bbbdc65b1ff", "function": null, "arguments": null, "transaction": { "from": "0xaf9d732e8a5607caccb72df525851849c33edf9e", "gas": "0x15a02", "value": "0x0", "input": "0x604580600e600039806000f350fe7fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffe03601600081602082378035828234f58015156039578182fd5b8082525050506014600cf3", "nonce": "0x0", "chainId": "0x9" }, "additionalContracts": [], "isFixedGasLimit": false }, { "hash": null, "transactionType": "CALL", "contractName": null, "contractAddress": "0xddca24376aa96d8f56667d78306a3bbbdc65b1ff", "function": null, "arguments": null, "transaction": { "from": "0xaf9d732e8a5607caccb72df525851849c33edf9e", "to": "0xddca24376aa96d8f56667d78306a3bbbdc65b1ff", "gas": "0xfb603", "value": "0x0", "input": ... ``` ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
For complex atomic operations on consensus registry. Should be merged after matter-labs/era-contracts#805 Tested manually by running `cargo -p zk_inception -- e init --dev`, which populated the multicall3 address in contract.yaml to non-zero value.
## What ❔ <!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? --> <!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. --> <!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) --> ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`. Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
…gossipnet (matter-labs#2476) Tested on a hetzner instance. --------- Co-authored-by: Bruno França <[email protected]>
…2893) Fix `zki chain update-toen-multiplier-setter` to take the address from the chain config instead of the ecosystem.
## What ❔ Report reasons of failed calls in prover API metrics. ## Why ❔ To have more observability ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Do not use old zk tool inside our ci. Only zk docker is still in place will be replaced soon by DevOps team ## Why ❔ We are deprecating old zk tool and now it's not needed anymore ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`. --------- Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <[email protected]>
## What ❔ increases max_nonce_ahead in default config ## Why ❔ fix flaky test ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
…s#2866) ## What ❔ Add zk_supervisor override configs command ## Why ❔ In some cases we want to override some default configs. Right now it is done manually and we need proper automation for regular use/ci.
|
Hey there! 👋🏼 We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.
Details: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What ❔
Why ❔
Checklist
zk fmtandzk lint.