Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[sc-223067] allow branch pruning to be disabled in main job #405

Merged

Conversation

jazanne
Copy link
Contributor

@jazanne jazanne commented Oct 30, 2023

Summary

  1. allow pruning step to be skipped in code refs job
  2. disable pruning by default in github action

more details

This will help silence ongoing error messages in GitHub Action until we are able to implement a suitable fix.

It's also just a good idea to allow this to be disabled in case a user has a reason for keeping old branches.

@shortcut-integration
Copy link

This pull request has been linked to Shortcut Story #223067: allow branch pruning to be disabled in code refs.

@jazanne jazanne force-pushed the jwhite/sc-223067/allow-branch-pruning-to-be-disabled-in-code branch from 13418e3 to e7f8bb4 Compare October 30, 2023 17:05
@jazanne jazanne marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2023 17:21
@jazanne jazanne requested review from a team October 30, 2023 17:21
Copy link
Contributor

@mmrj mmrj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ from Docs

@jazanne jazanne force-pushed the jwhite/sc-223067/allow-branch-pruning-to-be-disabled-in-code branch from 6e7168e to 2235ac9 Compare January 5, 2024 18:03
@jazanne jazanne merged commit 11ae20f into main Jan 8, 2024
2 checks passed
@jazanne jazanne deleted the jwhite/sc-223067/allow-branch-pruning-to-be-disabled-in-code branch January 8, 2024 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants