Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable RefPort connections #24

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Enable RefPort connections #24

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

PhilippPlank
Copy link
Contributor

-added RefPorts and VarPorts to find_processes
-added var_ports to compile_proc_models
-channels are now also build for RefPort -> VarPort connections
-added unit tests

Next step is to add RefPorts in the synchronization protocol to allow sending data.

-added var_ports to compile_proc_models
-channels are now also build for RefPort -> VarPort connections
-added unit tests
Copy link
Contributor

@awintel awintel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just came across this... so leaving some comments.

tests/magma/compiler/test_compiler.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/magma/compiler/test_compiler.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/magma/compiler/test_compiler.py Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/magma/compiler/test_compiler.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
PhilippPlank and others added 6 commits November 4, 2021 13:43
…stinctly and to throw an error if a naming conflict with an existing attribute still occurs

-added unit tests for VarPorts
-added _get_port_dtype(..) to compiler, to get the d_type of a Port and handle implicitly created VarPorts and throw an error if the corresponding ProcessModel does not know the Port
-added unit test
- modified PortInitializer to expect type "type" instead of "intc"
@mgkwill
Copy link
Contributor

mgkwill commented Nov 10, 2021

Source now moved from /lava to /src/lava.
Tests now moved from /tests to /tests/lava.

@mgkwill mgkwill self-requested a review November 11, 2021 00:10
@PhilippPlank PhilippPlank linked an issue Nov 12, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants