Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fixed mappin gof payload to multiple port pairs #657

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2023
Merged

Fixed mappin gof payload to multiple port pairs #657

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2023

Conversation

ysingh7
Copy link
Contributor

@ysingh7 ysingh7 commented Apr 3, 2023

Issue Number:

Objective of pull request:

Pull request checklist

Your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Issue created that explains the change and why it's needed
  • Tests are part of the PR (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)
  • PR conforms to Coding Conventions
  • PR applys BSD 3-clause or LGPL2.1+ Licenses to all code files
  • Lint (flakeheaven lint src/lava tests/) and (bandit -r src/lava/.) pass locally
  • Build tests (pytest) passes locally

Pull request type

Please check your PR type:

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation changes
  • Other (please describe):

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior?

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Supplemental information

@ysingh7 ysingh7 requested review from srrisbud and gkarray April 3, 2023 18:57
@ysingh7 ysingh7 requested a review from mgkwill April 7, 2023 17:56
@mgkwill mgkwill merged commit aefd358 into main Apr 12, 2023
@mgkwill mgkwill deleted the c_map_fix branch April 12, 2023 23:38
monkin77 pushed a commit to monkin77/thesis-lava that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2024
@ysingh7
Fix mapping of payload to multiple port pairs (lava-nc#657)
67de966
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gkarray gkarray gkarray approved these changes

@mgkwill mgkwill mgkwill approved these changes

@srrisbud srrisbud Awaiting requested review from srrisbud

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@ysingh7 @mgkwill @gkarray