Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP]: Redesign Liberapay #935

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[WIP]: Redesign Liberapay #935

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

EdOverflow
Copy link
Member

This is a PR for #734. My goal is to make Liberapay look less like bootstrapy and more unique, and appealing to its users.

image

@EdOverflow EdOverflow added Review UI issues concerning the User Interface labels Jan 17, 2018
@sirjamesgray
Copy link

do you have a before / after image to illustrate the changes?

@EdOverflow
Copy link
Member Author

The changes mainly consist of subtle adjustments to individual components of Liberapay.

Before After
image image
Before After
image image
Before After
image image
Before After
image image

@EdOverflow
Copy link
Member Author

@Changaco, when you find time, could you please take a look at the changes I made here? Is there anything you would like me to add or change?

@Changaco
Copy link
Member

Changaco commented Feb 3, 2018

I'm not convinced by some of the proposed changes.

  • Dropping the navbar background color makes the website look more "bland" to me, like when it was still gray 2 years ago.
  • The footer seems too big (in height).
  • The uppercase jumbotron feels like it's shouting at me.

But maybe that's just me. Can we get other opinions?

Also:

  • Putting a gray line under links looks okay, but it's a problem for block links (e.g. links that wrap an avatar).
  • I remember at least one person speaking up against round avatars in a previous issue.
  • It's not okay to make minor changes to translatable strings without updating the PO files.
  • This branch needs to be rebased, and we don't use merges inside Pull Requests.
  • The first change I would have expected to see in a PR that aims to make Liberapay "look less bootstrapy and more unique" is a modification of the theme colors in variables.scss, yet this branch doesn't touch them.

@LiamDawe
Copy link

LiamDawe commented Feb 7, 2018

Just to add my thoughts too, a lot of the changes seem totally unnecessary. Like the navbar, removing the colour? Why? It needs to stand out, it's a navbar.

@jorgesumle
Copy link
Contributor

I don't understand much about design, but I recall @onpon4 didn't like the yellow color at all from a forum discussion, here the reasoning:

That's not what I was talking about. The layout is fine. The problem is the colors, specifically that yellow banner and the yellow "donate" button. This is a terrible color choice and it's even worse to mix it with blue. The text also has bad contrast, so it's difficult to read, and the white background is overly bright.
Combine these together and if I were to point most people to this page, they would click straight away before I even have a chance to sell it to them.

@EdOverflow
Copy link
Member Author

@jorgesumle, that is my opinion on the yellow too. I don't plan on leaving the navbar like this, but I really dislike the current yellow colour on liberapay.com. I will mark this PR as a [WIP] to make it clear to all of you that I am still working on this and by no means done.

@EdOverflow EdOverflow changed the title Redesign Liberapay [WIP]: Redesign Liberapay Feb 7, 2018
@Changaco Changaco removed the Review label Mar 4, 2018
@comradekingu
Copy link
Contributor

comradekingu commented May 9, 2018

There are no less than 4 buttons to create an account here. I think one is enough.
Donation buttons are more effective in green https://chuffed.org/academy/articles/detail/how-to-increase-your-donation-page-conversion
This also suggests not requiring an account before donating, which may be possible, but is not clear. Waiting for #1052 to merge before getting on with rewriting the blocks and the FAQ.

Any amount of design will not overcome the busy look of too much text, which is an improvement directly related to induced stress for the user. I can't seem to overstate this enough.

"Sponsors" and "Thanks" naturally belong at the bottom because it is where one would expect to find them.

I liked the yellow top bars.

@MartinDelille
Copy link
Contributor

I personnally prefer this new UI to the current one. Is it still goind on?

I collected the following proposition from the comment:

  • reduce footer height
  • update PO files
  • edit variables.scss
  • rebase and fix conflict
  • Remove donate button count to one

@Changaco Changaco added the visual issues about how Liberapay looks label Sep 30, 2018
@@ -70,27 +70,39 @@ recent = query_cache.one("""

<div class="jumbotron section">
<p><img src="{{ website.asset('liberapay/icon-v2_yellow-r.svg') }}" height=100 width=100 /></p>
<p>{{ _("Liberapay is a recurrent donations platform.") }}</p>
<p>{{ _("We help you fund the creators and projects you appreciate.") }}</p>
<h2>{{ _("Liberapay is a recurrent donations platform") }}</h2>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<h2>{{ _("Liberapay is a recurrent donations platform") }}</h2>
<h2>{{ _("Liberapay is a recurrent donation platform") }}</h2>

@rkingett
Copy link

rkingett commented Feb 6, 2021

Could we add AccessLint so that our accessibility is constantly reviewed? Especially for this redesign?

The best thing would be to use semantic HTML but the latest Bootstrap has accessibility considerations built in, I think.

@Changaco
Copy link
Member

Changaco commented Feb 7, 2021

I have enabled AccessLint for this repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
UI issues concerning the User Interface visual issues about how Liberapay looks
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants