Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove compatibility workarounds for Python 2.6 #770

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2018
Merged

Remove compatibility workarounds for Python 2.6 #770

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2018

Conversation

jdufresne
Copy link
Contributor

Support for Python 2.6 was removed in 33a9a1a. As it is no longer supported, can remove compatibility workarounds that were put in place to Python 2.6's outdated unittest.

Support for Python 2.6 was removed in
33a9a1a. As it is no longer supported,
can remove compatibility workarounds that were put in place to Python
2.6's outdated unittest.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #770 into master will decrease coverage by 0.14%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #770      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.13%   64.99%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        1417     1417              
  Branches      222      222              
==========================================
- Hits          923      921       -2     
- Misses        443      444       +1     
- Partials       51       52       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
locust/clients.py 87.64% <0%> (-2.25%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fcd9fe7...acbbe92. Read the comment docs.

@cgoldberg
Copy link
Member

👍 LGTM.. going to merge.

@cgoldberg cgoldberg merged commit 391c4cf into locustio:master Apr 28, 2018
@jdufresne jdufresne deleted the workaround branch October 19, 2019 23:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants