Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ORCA-666] Ensure failing policy checks don't discard the locks. #44

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 4, 2021

Conversation

nishkrishnan
Copy link
Contributor

Unlike plans, a failing policy check shouldn't discard a lock since most of the time (unless there is a bug) it'll be prompting for approval.

msarvar
msarvar previously approved these changes Feb 4, 2021
Copy link

@msarvar msarvar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, I think you can remove ExpMergeable completely.

@nishkrishnan nishkrishnan merged commit 0e4e7b1 into release-v0.15.0-lyft.1 Feb 4, 2021
nishkrishnan added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2021
* [ORCA-666] Ensure failing policy checks don't discard the locks.

* Fix tests

* fix.
@nishkrishnan nishkrishnan deleted the nish/orca-666 branch March 2, 2021 21:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants